2019
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.13.016501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic segmentation of multisensor remote sensing imagery with deep ConvNets and higher-order conditional random fields

Abstract: Aerial images acquired by multiple sensors provide comprehensive and diverse information of materials and objects within a surveyed area. The current use of pretrained deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) is usually constrained to three-band images (i.e., RGB) obtained from a single optical sensor. Additional spectral bands from a multiple sensor setup introduce challenges for the use of DCNN. We fuse the RGB feature information obtained from a deep learning framework with light detection and ranging (Li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, since the OSM building map did not provide a precise building mask, particularly for the building boundaries, we verified inaccuracies in some parts of the images. This problem was alleviated by implementing a Conditional Random Field method (CRF), which has been primarily investigated in the literature as a refinement over the U-net or Fully Connected Networks (FCNs) results [56,77,78]. Accordingly, a fully/dense CRF model developed by Krähenbühl and Koltun [79] was employed to optimize the ResUnet results.…”
Section: Step 4: Updating the Building Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, since the OSM building map did not provide a precise building mask, particularly for the building boundaries, we verified inaccuracies in some parts of the images. This problem was alleviated by implementing a Conditional Random Field method (CRF), which has been primarily investigated in the literature as a refinement over the U-net or Fully Connected Networks (FCNs) results [56,77,78]. Accordingly, a fully/dense CRF model developed by Krähenbühl and Koltun [79] was employed to optimize the ResUnet results.…”
Section: Step 4: Updating the Building Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our applied focus in this paper is land cover classification based on remote sensing. Lately, the FCNs and encoderdecoder architectures have been widely adapted and applied to the ISPRS [8] Semantic Labeling Contest [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], and the DeepGlobe CVPR-2018 [9] challenge of automatic classification of land cover types [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. Paisitkriangkrai et al [20] proposed a scheme for high-resolution land cover classification using a combination of a patchbased CNN and a random forest classification that is trained on hand-crafted features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As CRFs have the ability to capture both local and long-range dependencies within an image, they significantly improve CNN segmentation results [59]. The existing CRFs, such as the fully connected CRF modeling processes, are complicated and require a large number of calculations [60]. To complete the calculations, previous studies have used approximate calculations [60,61], reduction of the number of samples involved in modeling [62,63], and introduced conditional independence [64][65][66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%