Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Semantic Computing (IEEE ICSC 2015) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icosc.2015.7050830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic service discovery and matching for semi-automatic service mashup

Abstract: A service mashup goes through several processes, which it takes much time and efforts for developers to mash up of many heterogeneous web services. To mitigate the complexity of a serviee mashup and automate the mashup process, the present paper proposes semantic service discovery and matching technologies. The semantic service discovery technology is eapable of finding out more appropriate and ranked services with a given query, and the semantic service matehing technology enables searehing for eompatible and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is composed of data, processing and visualization gadgets. Another work (Park et al 2015) proposes a semantic service mashup for the development of a smart TV application. For this, they construct a semantic service discovery and a semantic service matching to automate the mashup process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is composed of data, processing and visualization gadgets. Another work (Park et al 2015) proposes a semantic service mashup for the development of a smart TV application. For this, they construct a semantic service discovery and a semantic service matching to automate the mashup process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several papers have dealt with the automatic integration of data and APIs in mashup applications ( (Kopecký et al, 2007), (Lathem et al, 2007), (Maleshkova et al, 2009), (Ngu et al, 2010), (Meditskos & Bassiliades, 2011), (Malki & Benslimane, 2012), , (Lee, 2014), (Tjoa et al, 2015), (Park et al, 2015), (Lee, 2015) and (Trinh et al, 2016)). The key challenges of these approaches are the need to 1) compute semantic and syntactic similarities between data in different services and 2) create or modify workflows in mashup applications without enlisting the talents of the original developers or vendor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%