Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1995966.1995989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic similarity in heterogeneous ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the propagated interest depends on the distance between the node that receives the direct feedback and the one that receives the propagated feedback, it would be interesting to see how our approach would behave when the notion of exponentially decreasing edge lengths in the ontology is used (see [5]). Another interesting feature that we would like to explore is adding constraints to our propagation algorithm along the lines of [15], such as concept type constraints (no propagation to certain kinds of nodes) or distance constraints (stopping the propagation upon reaching the nodes too far from the initial node).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the propagated interest depends on the distance between the node that receives the direct feedback and the one that receives the propagated feedback, it would be interesting to see how our approach would behave when the notion of exponentially decreasing edge lengths in the ontology is used (see [5]). Another interesting feature that we would like to explore is adding constraints to our propagation algorithm along the lines of [15], such as concept type constraints (no propagation to certain kinds of nodes) or distance constraints (stopping the propagation upon reaching the nodes too far from the initial node).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-A pertinence module, which evaluates the pertinence between a newly inserted fact and those existing in the repository. The measure of pertinence we use is introduced in [14] and is based on the friendship between involved people, on the colocation between facts (co-occurrence in space and time), and on semantic similarity between the mentioned entities, computed using the distance based approach proposed in [6].…”
Section: Telleatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-different facts use different predicates taken from the predicate ontology to express their content; -each fact has only one predicate since every fact can be decomposed into more facts with only one predicate; -each predicate has a set of associated values for different role fillers; -each role might have 0 or more role fillers; -the semantic similarity between two predicates or two role fillers is calculated using a measure presented in [6]; -co-location estimates the possibility for the actors to meet while performing the described actions.…”
Section: Server-side Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further improvement of distance-based propagation can be obtained with conceptual distance where the main idea is to modify the lengths of the edges in the ontology graph, as initially proposed in [5]. First, the set of relevant concepts is determined.…”
Section: Propagating User Interest Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%