2005
DOI: 10.1007/11574620_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantically Rich Recommendations in Social Networks for Sharing, Exchanging and Ranking Semantic Context

Abstract: Abstract. Recommender algorithms have been quite successfully employed in a variety of scenarios from filtering applications to recommendations of movies and books at Amazon.com. However, all these algorithms focus on single item recommendations and do not consider any more complex recommendation structures. This paper explores how semantically rich complex recommendation structures, represented as RDF graphs, can be exchanged and shared in a distributed social network. After presenting a motivating scenario w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of [60] works on top of a (process) logs repository and none of the methods presented there [60] can be used in our scenario. For further information on other variants of recommendation mechanisms, we refer to [27,74].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of [60] works on top of a (process) logs repository and none of the methods presented there [60] can be used in our scenario. For further information on other variants of recommendation mechanisms, we refer to [27,74].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, [10] combines ontologybased solutions with information gathered by tagging mechanisms typical of social networks, in order to provide a semantically enabled recommendation system. Instead, [11] supports a distributed social network based on recommendation structures implemented as RDF graphs. In particular, it supports the spread of data and resources based on semantically rich information stored in FOAF documents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may receive documents from other peers together with their recommendations. These recommendations are weighted by a local estimate of the sender's expertise in the topic [9,6].…”
Section: Aggregated Ranking Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%