2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semen production in two rabbit lines divergently selected for 63-d body weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also evidenced differences in the variability of semen characteristics both between and within bucks. Brun et al (2006) did not find differences in male libido between 2 lines divergently selected for body weight at 63 d, but reported that males from the lighter line had higher ejaculate volume, mass motility and number of ejaculates suitable for AI, but lower sperm concentration than males from the heavier line. In a posterior study, the same lines were compared in fertilising ability and no differences were found (Theau-Clément et al, 2007).…”
Section: Genetic Variation Between Linesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also evidenced differences in the variability of semen characteristics both between and within bucks. Brun et al (2006) did not find differences in male libido between 2 lines divergently selected for body weight at 63 d, but reported that males from the lighter line had higher ejaculate volume, mass motility and number of ejaculates suitable for AI, but lower sperm concentration than males from the heavier line. In a posterior study, the same lines were compared in fertilising ability and no differences were found (Theau-Clément et al, 2007).…”
Section: Genetic Variation Between Linesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In relation to sperm morphology and acrosome membrane functionality, Lavara et al (2012a) concluded that there is an apparent tendency for genes favouring increased daily gain to slightly decrease normal sperm per ejaculate (less sperm with normal acrosome status and more with abnormal forms), but the magnitude of the genetic correlations does not seem to be high .02 for normal acrosome status; 0.25, HPD95%=-0.18, 0.66 for sperm abnormalities). On the other hand, Brun et al (2006) did not find differences in male libido between 2 lines divergently selected for body weight at 63 d, but reported that males from the line with the lowest body weight had higher ejaculate volume, sperm motility and number of ejaculates suitable for AI, but lower sperm concentration than males from the line with the highest body weight. Overall, the total number of sperms per ejaculate was not significantly different between the 2 lines.…”
Section: Genetic Relationship Between Seminal Traits and Male Reprodumentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immediately after semen collection, pH, volume and mass motility (coded from 0 to 9) were estimated according to Brun et al (2002). Sperm cell motility was analysed from a 2-ml sample after dilution (1 : 40) in Galap (IMV Technologies, L'Aigle, France) using a computer-assisted sperm analysis system (HTMA-IVOS, version 10; Hamilton-Thorne Research, Beverly, MA, USA) according to the set-up parameters of Brun et al (2006). This dilution rate is routinely used with the present CASA system to decrease the frequency of refusal of analyses due to excessively high concentrations, making it possible to limit the handling of the semen before the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, due to the high content of prostatic vesicles and other kind of cells other than spermatozoa in rabbit ejaculates (Farrel et al, 1992;Castellini et al, 2006b) this technique does not provide accurate data. However, these ejaculates can be evaluated using fluorescent stains that label only sperm and not extraneous particles (Riedy et al, 1991).Using these fluorescent stains, the sperm concentration can be determined using fluorometry (Theau-Clément and Faliéres; and flow cytometry . The main problem of these techniques is the cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%