Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016) 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s16-1001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SemEval-2016 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter

Abstract: This paper describes the system we submitted to SemEval-2017 Task 4 (Sen-timent Analysis in Twitter), specifically subtasks A, B, and D. Our main focus was topic-based message polarity classification on a two-point scale (subtask B). The system we submitted uses a Support Vector Machine classifier with rich set of features, ranging from standard to more creative, task-specific features, including a series of rating-based features as well as features that account for sentimental reminiscence of past topics and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
549
0
18

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 567 publications
(569 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
549
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the presented system was ranked 1 st out of 34 participants, with an F1-score of 63.30 on the Twitter-2016 test set. See (Nakov et al, 2016) for further details. Table 4 summarizes the results of individual subsystems, as well as the final system on each test set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the presented system was ranked 1 st out of 34 participants, with an F1-score of 63.30 on the Twitter-2016 test set. See (Nakov et al, 2016) for further details. Table 4 summarizes the results of individual subsystems, as well as the final system on each test set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum count was set to 5 since words used fewer than 5 times do not add any information to the analysis and the default setting in Gensim is set to 5 as the minimum count [35]. Adding more training data could improve these results, however, a study by Nakov et al annotated 6,000 tweets and had similar F1-scores to our study [36]. Since these words occured fewer than 5 times, the algorithm was not able to identify these tweets as negative as it was not able to determine the words closer to these words.…”
Section: Classification Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The goal of sentiment analysis is to specify the behavior of the person based on the general contextual polarity of the text (negative, positive, or neutral). It has many useful applications in education, commerce, heath, security and numerous others (Nakov et al, 2016;Imran et al, 2015). Since the sentiment is a language dependent, it is significantly important to consider the language and culture characteristics in analysing the sentiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the sentiment is a language dependent, it is significantly important to consider the language and culture characteristics in analysing the sentiment. Several sentiment analysis studies have been carried out based on the English language (Nakov et al, 2016;Poria et al, 2016;Agarwal and Mittal, 2016;Cambria, 2016). The Arabic language is one of the top Semitic languages; approximately 422 million persons use the Arabic language in 27 countries (UNESCO, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%