2011
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2011-20338-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-analytic approach to higher-order corrections in simple muonic bound systems: Vacuum polarization, self-energy and radiative-recoil

Abstract: The current discrepancy of theory and experiment observed recently in muonic hydrogen necessitates a reinvestigation of all corrections to contribute to the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen (µH), muonic deuterium (µD), the muonic 3 He ion (denoted here as µ 3 He + ), as well as in the muonic 4 He ion (µ 4 He + ). Here, we choose a semi-analytic approach and evaluate a number of higher-order corrections to vacuum polarization (VP) semi-analytically, while remaining integrals over the spectral density of VP are per… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A year ago one might have worried that some of the corrections were single-sourced, i.e., had been calculated by only one person or group. Today, any thinkably important correction has been multiply checked; some reviews and/or additional small corrections are given in [3,4,31,32]. We shall mention here only a few topics, mainly the higher order twophoton corrections to the spectroscopy (because of its relevance to the discussion of the sources of the discrepancy), the two-photon corrections to scattering measurements (because they are still somewhat unsettled, though not apparently a decisive problem), and the lattice gauge theory proton radius results (because they may be very relevant in the future).…”
Section: Calculating the Proton Radius Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A year ago one might have worried that some of the corrections were single-sourced, i.e., had been calculated by only one person or group. Today, any thinkably important correction has been multiply checked; some reviews and/or additional small corrections are given in [3,4,31,32]. We shall mention here only a few topics, mainly the higher order twophoton corrections to the spectroscopy (because of its relevance to the discussion of the sources of the discrepancy), the two-photon corrections to scattering measurements (because they are still somewhat unsettled, though not apparently a decisive problem), and the lattice gauge theory proton radius results (because they may be very relevant in the future).…”
Section: Calculating the Proton Radius Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Again, by comparing the theoretical prediction of many authors [33][34][35][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73], as summarized by us [74], values of the alpha-particle and helion charge radii can be deduced with an accuracy of about 3×10 −4 . These will be compared with the values from electron scattering [75,76] and He spectroscopy [77][78][79][80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Muonic Helium Ionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Jentschura and Wundt calculated some Lamb shift contributions in their Refs. [50,51]. They are referred to as "Jentschura" for simplicity.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28) they use the more exact calculation from Jentschura. Jentschura [50] (Eq. 29), and the Karshenboim group [52] (Tab.…”
Section: Nuclear Structure-independent Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%