2018
DOI: 10.1101/340489
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Analytic Nonparametric Bayesian Inference for Spike-Spike Neuronal Connectivity

Abstract: Estimating causal connectivity between spiking neurons from measured spike sequences is one of the main challenges of systems neuroscience. In this paper we introduce two nonparametric Bayesian methods for spike-membrane and spikespike causal connectivity based on Gaussian process regression. For spike-spike connectivity, we derive a new semi-analytic variational approximation of the response functions of a non-linear dynamical model of interconnected neurons. This semi-analytic method exploits the tractabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, in Bayesian statistics, approximate inference under different divergences is a field of active research, although the primary focus is not on dynamic models. Some examples include α-divergence [15], χ-divergence [16], Wasserstein divergence [17], and Renyi divergence [18]. In particular, there are two papers that use an energy function related to ours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, in Bayesian statistics, approximate inference under different divergences is a field of active research, although the primary focus is not on dynamic models. Some examples include α-divergence [15], χ-divergence [16], Wasserstein divergence [17], and Renyi divergence [18]. In particular, there are two papers that use an energy function related to ours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently has a novel variant of BNMs been proposed in which brain dynamics during the "resting state" are described by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and which provided maximum likelihood estimates of directed connection strengths in networks comprising up to 68 regions (Gilson et al, 2016(Gilson et al, , 2017Rolls et al, 2018;Senden et al, 2018). Additionally, other variants of connectivity analyses have been proposed that might potentially enable the investigation of larger networks (Ambrogioni et al, 2017;Prando et al, 2017).In contrast, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) uses a Bayesian framework to compute the posterior distribution over effective connectivity parameters. DCM was originally devised for fMRI and later extended to other modalities like M/EEG (David et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding effective connectivity has long been a central challenge in neuroscience [1,[50][51][52]. The identification of connectivity has garnered significant interest in recent years, primarily due to advancements enabling the simultaneous recording of a vast number of neurons [53][54][55][56]. Essentially, we now exploit the understanding that synaptic connections induce voltage fluctuations capable of triggering postsynaptic action potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%