2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2013.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automatic detection of linear archaeological traces from orthorectified aerial images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multispectral information from satellite images was a fundamental approach employed in the detection of buried negative structures (drainage channels and circular crop marks), which were invisible in situ because of the flatness of the terrain and the impact of different land‐use strategies. With the passage of time and the development of on‐board systems, many studies worldwide have used aerial or satellite information and DTMs: De Laet, Paulissen, and Waelkens () used the Ikonos system to identify archaeological structures in Turkey; Lasaponara and Masini () used Aster and QuickBird images in Tiwanaku to locate several structures, including buried channels; Trier, Larsen, and Solberg () detected circular structures in Norway from high‐resolution satellite images; Menze and Ur () have mapped patterns of settlements in Northern Mesopotamia; Figorito and Tarantino () are conducting research in Italy for the detection of archaeological signs using high‐resolution aerial images, and Lasaponara, Leucci, Masini, Persico, and Scardozzi () explored the use of remote sensing in Hierapolis, Turkey. However, even the highly accurate QuickBird images cannot correctly detect minor yet important structures, such as domestic buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multispectral information from satellite images was a fundamental approach employed in the detection of buried negative structures (drainage channels and circular crop marks), which were invisible in situ because of the flatness of the terrain and the impact of different land‐use strategies. With the passage of time and the development of on‐board systems, many studies worldwide have used aerial or satellite information and DTMs: De Laet, Paulissen, and Waelkens () used the Ikonos system to identify archaeological structures in Turkey; Lasaponara and Masini () used Aster and QuickBird images in Tiwanaku to locate several structures, including buried channels; Trier, Larsen, and Solberg () detected circular structures in Norway from high‐resolution satellite images; Menze and Ur () have mapped patterns of settlements in Northern Mesopotamia; Figorito and Tarantino () are conducting research in Italy for the detection of archaeological signs using high‐resolution aerial images, and Lasaponara, Leucci, Masini, Persico, and Scardozzi () explored the use of remote sensing in Hierapolis, Turkey. However, even the highly accurate QuickBird images cannot correctly detect minor yet important structures, such as domestic buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tarantino and Figorito (2014) and Figorito and Tarantino (2014) applied a supervised classification, and therefore a semi-automatic procedure, based on segmentation of historical aerial photographs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, most methods focus on applying radiometric enhancement, spatial filters and spectral indexes for archaeological investigations [15,[36][37][38]. In order to save time and manpower, several studies have tried to employ (semi-) automatic methods to extract archaeological traces [14,16,21,26,[39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supervised methods [34,[41][42][43][44] use machine learning concepts to train an algorithm to extract archaeological traces. In the learning phase, a training set of images containing archaeological traces labeled by domain experts is fed to an algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation