2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automating the calculation of catchment scale geomorphic controls on river diversity using publically available datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an average reach length of 0.7 km this resulted in adjoining streamline elevation raster values being 0.7 km apart, maximising the likelihood of a downstream decrease in elevation being detected between adjacent reaches using the 30 m resolution DEM. The DEM’s elevation data was then visually examined and compared to the NSW River Styles network of streams to check that the upstream-downstream sequences of reaches was correct [ 14 ].…”
Section: Expected Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With an average reach length of 0.7 km this resulted in adjoining streamline elevation raster values being 0.7 km apart, maximising the likelihood of a downstream decrease in elevation being detected between adjacent reaches using the 30 m resolution DEM. The DEM’s elevation data was then visually examined and compared to the NSW River Styles network of streams to check that the upstream-downstream sequences of reaches was correct [ 14 ].…”
Section: Expected Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing number of semi-automated workflows for the geomorphic analysis of river systems [14][15][16][17][18][19]. These can provide workflows based on proprietary GIS software toolkits (ArcGIS and TopoToolbox) and python script, which are ideally suited to expert GIS users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1 in 10 year return interval flow has been observed to produce geomorphically effective floods in similar coastal river settings (Lisenby & Fryirs, 2016). Network scale metrics of contributing catchment area calculated from a flow accumulation raster was used to calculate continuous discharge in the Richmond catchment using a discharge–area empirical relationship (Khan et al, 2021b, 2021a). 100.25emyear return interval0.25emQ=8.2667×A0.662 Surveys and samples of bed material size from 25 locations across the catchment were collected in the field during low flow conditions in August 2019 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discharge–area relationship for the Richmond catchment was extrapolated from the historical flow dataset using Log‐Pearson Type III statistical analysis (Khan et al, 2021b, 2021a). For this, long‐term discharge data was obtained for seven gauging stations across Richmond catchment (Supporting Information Figure S1, Table S1 and S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation