2018
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2018.2809622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Blind SI Cancellation for In-Band Full-Duplex Wireless Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With powerful digital signal processing techniques, digital cancellers with various features have been developed, as shown in TABLE I. In this field, it is common to deal with RF impairments [12], [16], [22]- [29], [34], [37], [38], phase noise [35], [36], and application to multi-input and multi-output (MIMO) systems [24], [25], [40], [41], and application of blind signal processing [42], [43]. In addition to the research focused on digital cancellers composed only of digital signal processing, there are also studies integrating auxiliary receivers [31]- [33].…”
Section: B Review Of Previous Research: Digital Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With powerful digital signal processing techniques, digital cancellers with various features have been developed, as shown in TABLE I. In this field, it is common to deal with RF impairments [12], [16], [22]- [29], [34], [37], [38], phase noise [35], [36], and application to multi-input and multi-output (MIMO) systems [24], [25], [40], [41], and application of blind signal processing [42], [43]. In addition to the research focused on digital cancellers composed only of digital signal processing, there are also studies integrating auxiliary receivers [31]- [33].…”
Section: B Review Of Previous Research: Digital Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve higher channel capacity on in-band full-duplex communications, cancellers should have a lower number of training symbols. For example, self-interference cancellers with blind signal processing have been proposed on orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems [42], [43]. However, these techniques require symbol synchronization between the self-interference and the desired signal because they are applied in the frequency domain [43].…”
Section: B Review Of Previous Research: Digital Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, M , N m is circularly symmetric complex Gaussian (CSCG) noise, and X m is the training signal for calibration. It is worth mentioning thatD n J = diag {N m /(d m t X m )} means that transmitter noise is dominant since calibration occurs in short-range communication scenarios, and transmitter noise is much more significant than receiver noise [14,20,21]. Thus, the variance of the mth entry in D n J can be written in the form of δ e (m) = 1/SNR J (m), where SNR J (m) is the SNR in the mth transmitter.…”
Section: Downlink Beamforming With Reciprocity Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in (20), a larger ξ k means we potentially lower the achievable rates due to imperfect calibration. Mathematically, L → ∞ if ξ k grows without bound.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome such mobile device sustainability challenges, wireless energy harvesting (WEH) is proposed for the self-sustained communication through wireless charging [13]. Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) [14] arose as a breakthrough technology that divides radio frequency (RF) signals into two parts, information transmission and energy collection, providing a feasible solution for excessive network energy consumption [15], [16]. SWIPT is able to apply two different receiver architectures; time switching (TS) periodically switches between information decoding (ID) and energy harvesting (EH), and power splitting (PS) simultaneously executes ID and EH [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%