2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.03451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-decentralized approximation of a LQR-based controller for a one-dimensional cantilever array

Abstract: We apply the method of semi-decentralized approximation, introduced in Lenczner and Yakoubi [2009] and Yakoubi [2010], to the linear quadratic regulation of a one-dimensional array of cantilevers with regularly spaced actuators and sensors. It is based on two mathematical concepts, namely on functions of operators, and on the Cauchy integral formula. We evaluate its performances and the errors of approximation. We also propose its implementation in terms of an analog processor, namely a periodic network of r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…so by construction e(λ) = 0 and e(Λ) = 0. Multiplying the last equality by Φ Z to the left and by Φ −1 Z to the right, using Lemma 6.2 (3 ) and (4 ), and posing P = Φ Z p(Λ) Φ −1 Z we find that P satisfies the Riccati equation (13). Next, the nonnegativity and symmetry of p with Lemma 6.2 (1 ) and (5 ) yield the nonnegativity and self-adjointness of P .…”
Section: For Another Hilbert Spacementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…so by construction e(λ) = 0 and e(Λ) = 0. Multiplying the last equality by Φ Z to the left and by Φ −1 Z to the right, using Lemma 6.2 (3 ) and (4 ), and posing P = Φ Z p(Λ) Φ −1 Z we find that P satisfies the Riccati equation (13). Next, the nonnegativity and symmetry of p with Lemma 6.2 (1 ) and (5 ) yield the nonnegativity and self-adjointness of P .…”
Section: For Another Hilbert Spacementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Section 7.3, there is an example of observation operator C that is not a function of Λ, while in the paper , it is the case for B the control operator. For boundary control or observation problems, it is impossible to find such isomorphisms. Nevertheless, in Section 7.4, we show how to proceed to address some boundary control problems. Multiscale models with controls at the microscale, as in and , are also possible applications.…”
Section: Bounded Control Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two-scale model governing elastic deflections in a one-dimensional array of AFMs, see Figure 4, introduced in [5], is restated in a way [7] appropriate to its implemen tation by the finite element method. The base and the can tilevers are modeled by the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation in the first component XI of the macroscopic variable and in the second component Y 2 of the microscopic variable respectively.…”
Section: Two-scale Model Of Arrays Of Afmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the latency between the entrance of the first pixel of an image and the end of deflection computation must be as small as possi ble. All these requirements are stated in the perspective of implementing real-time active control for each cantilever (see [6], [7]). …”
Section: Design Goals and Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%