2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-supervised defect classification of steel surface based on multi-training and generative adversarial network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natarajan et al [31] proposed a flexible multi-layered deep feature extraction through transfer learning and SVM classifiers, which overcome the problem of over-fitting caused by small datasets. He et al [32] proposed a semi-supervised model of CNN for feature extraction and fed the representation features into a classifier for classification of steel surface defect. However, these methods can't give the exact location of defects.…”
Section: B Deep-learning-based Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natarajan et al [31] proposed a flexible multi-layered deep feature extraction through transfer learning and SVM classifiers, which overcome the problem of over-fitting caused by small datasets. He et al [32] proposed a semi-supervised model of CNN for feature extraction and fed the representation features into a classifier for classification of steel surface defect. However, these methods can't give the exact location of defects.…”
Section: B Deep-learning-based Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrial applications gradually adopt deep learning methods to detect industrial products. Due to the smaller number of defect datasets on hot-rolled steel surfaces, some papers used semi-supervised methods to augment datasets [32]- [34]. For example, Yiping Gao et al raised a method, which used the semi-supervised framework to generate fake labels to satisfied the label's requirement.…”
Section: Related Theory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu He et al showed that a categorized generative adversarial network (GAN) is used to generate a large amount of unmarked data against the network, and then the residual network is used for classification. The final classification accuracy rate is 99.56% [34]. In order to improve the detection accuracy, He, D et al used combined networks to detect surface defects, in which multi-group convolutional neural network (MG-CNN) was used to preclassification; and then different types of extracted defect features were input into another Yolo-based neural network for detection and recognition.…”
Section: Related Theory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images are obtained from the Northeastern University (NEU) surface database [20], [21], [22] which contains six types of defects (rolled-in scale (Rs), patches (Pa), crazing (Cr), pitted surface (Ps), inclusion (In) and scratches (Sc)) with 300 images for each defect (1800 total). Image size is 200×200 pixels with a .bmp format and the images are in grey-scale.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%