2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2022.3157032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images With Iterative Contrastive Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the proposed method's performance, we make comparisons with several popular semi-supervised methods on dam-water and building datasets, such as Paste Consistency (RanPaste) 14 , Pixel-Level SSL (PL-SSL) 15 , CCT, DCT, and Iterative Contrastive Network (ICNet) 16 . The comparison results are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the proposed method's performance, we make comparisons with several popular semi-supervised methods on dam-water and building datasets, such as Paste Consistency (RanPaste) 14 , Pixel-Level SSL (PL-SSL) 15 , CCT, DCT, and Iterative Contrastive Network (ICNet) 16 . The comparison results are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J.X. Wang et al presented an iterative contrastive network for remote sensing image semantic segmentation, which can continuously learn more potential information from labeled samples and generate better pseudo-labels for unlabeled data [34]. S. Desai et al employed active learning techniques to generate pseudo-labels from a small set of labeled examples which are used to augment the labeled training set, and enhanced the performance of remote sensing semantic segmentation network [35].…”
Section: Semi-supervised and Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [7] performed Transformation Consistency Regularization on the prediction labels of the teacher network and compared the results with the student network, extending randomness to the label level. ICNet [17], during the training process, alternates between transforming the student network and the teacher network. This approach allows the two networks to supervise each other, thereby increasing perturbations at the network level.…”
Section: Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation Of Aerial Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the consistency regularization methods applied in the field of remote sensing are mostly extensions of methods from natural scenes. For instance, Zhang [7] applies various random transformations and perturbations to images and predicted labels; ICNet [17] switches between student and teacher networks based on training rounds, adding network perturbations. Although these methods have improved the results of the remote sensing dataset, they focus more on the image level and do not consider the feature level of the remote sensing images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%