2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiautomated detection of cerebral microbleeds in magnetic resonance images

Abstract: Cerebral microbleeds (CMB) are increasingly being recognized as an important biomarker for neurovascular diseases. So far all attempts to count and quantify them have relied on manual methods that are time consuming and can be inconsistent. A technique is presented that semi-automatically identifies CMBs in susceptibility weighted images (SWI). This will both reduce the processing time and increase the consistency over manual methods. This technique relies on a statistical thresholding algorithm to identify hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate assessment of microbleeds is known to be hampered by several caveats (Cordonnier et al., 2007). Visual interobserver agreements report median kappa in the range between 0.44 and 0.78 (Cordonnier et al., 2007), and the computational methods existent up‐to‐date have reported degrees of error ranging from 20% to 30% (Barnes et al., 2011; Seghier et al., 2011). Our computational assessment is not exempt of errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate assessment of microbleeds is known to be hampered by several caveats (Cordonnier et al., 2007). Visual interobserver agreements report median kappa in the range between 0.44 and 0.78 (Cordonnier et al., 2007), and the computational methods existent up‐to‐date have reported degrees of error ranging from 20% to 30% (Barnes et al., 2011; Seghier et al., 2011). Our computational assessment is not exempt of errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done to reduce the possibility of detecting vessels with the algorithm, but note that large CMBs would also not be detected and therefore the algorithm is tuned to our current application. This method is also fully automatic and less computationally intensive than the method of Barnes et al, 4 which uses support vector machines to separate CBMs from other hypointensities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Проводили анализ локализации и количества ЦМК с последующим картированием с помощью рейтинговой анатомической шкалы микрокровоиз-лияний (MARS). Обнаружение трех ЦМК и более расценивали как множественные ЦМК [30,31]. Для оценки лейкоареоза использовали визуальную рей-тинговую шкалу F. Fazekas и соавт.…”
Section: материал и методыunclassified