DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-3350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiconducting properties of Mg2Si single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the compounds (Mg 2 Si, Mg 2 Ge, and Mg 2 Sn) share a similar electronic band structure consisting of two closely lying conduction bands (Figure and Table ). However, while the bottom of the conduction band in Mg 2 Si and Mg 2 Ge is dominated by the light electron band (C L band) that has its origin in the 3p orbital of Mg hybridized with the s orbital and d-e g orbital of Si or Ge, the bottom of the conduction band of Mg 2 Sn is dominated by the heavy electron band (C H band) arising from hybridization between the 3s orbital of Mg and the d-t 2g orbital of Sn. This implies that via the formation of solid solutions of Mg 2 Si 1– x Sn x and Mg 2 Ge 1– x Sn x , band convergence must take place at some particular value of x where the band edges of the light and heavy conduction bands attain comparable energy. When this happens, the band degeneracy ( N v ) of the system is increased, which leads to a significant enhancement of the density of states (DOS) effective mass m * = N v 2/3 m b * without increasing the band effective mass ( m b *).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the compounds (Mg 2 Si, Mg 2 Ge, and Mg 2 Sn) share a similar electronic band structure consisting of two closely lying conduction bands (Figure and Table ). However, while the bottom of the conduction band in Mg 2 Si and Mg 2 Ge is dominated by the light electron band (C L band) that has its origin in the 3p orbital of Mg hybridized with the s orbital and d-e g orbital of Si or Ge, the bottom of the conduction band of Mg 2 Sn is dominated by the heavy electron band (C H band) arising from hybridization between the 3s orbital of Mg and the d-t 2g orbital of Sn. This implies that via the formation of solid solutions of Mg 2 Si 1– x Sn x and Mg 2 Ge 1– x Sn x , band convergence must take place at some particular value of x where the band edges of the light and heavy conduction bands attain comparable energy. When this happens, the band degeneracy ( N v ) of the system is increased, which leads to a significant enhancement of the density of states (DOS) effective mass m * = N v 2/3 m b * without increasing the band effective mass ( m b *).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated an activation energy for this 325 °C curve as E a ≈ 50 meV. This value is much smaller than a semiconductor band gap of 0.65–0.8 eV in undoped Mg 2 Si. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Magnesium silicide, Mg 2 Si, is a semiconducting material with a narrow band gap of about 0.65–0.8 eV and interesting physical properties. At ambient conditions, Mg 2 Si crystallizes in a cubic antifluorite (CaF 2 )-type structure (space group no. 225 – Fm 3̅ m , Z = 4) (Figure a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can solve the Poisson equation of the barrier region (depletion region) on both sides of the interface to obtain the contact potential difference (band bending) of Mg 2 Si/4H‐SiC heterojunction. Assuming that Mg 2 Si/4H‐SiC is a mutant heterojunction and the Poisson equations on both sides of the interface are, respectively, the following: d2V1()xnormaldx2goodbreak=italicqN1ε11em()x1<x<0, d2V2()xnormaldx2goodbreak=goodbreak−italicqN2ε21em()0<x<x2, where x1, V1, N1=2×10160.2emcm3, and ε1=20 28 denote the barrier width, potential, carriers concentration, and static dielectric constant in the Mg 2 Si side, respectively; x2, V2, N2=2.3×10170.2emcm3, and ε2=10 26 denote the corresponding parameter in the 4H‐SiC side. Solving Equations () and () will yield the following: normalΔV1normalΔV2goodbreak=ε2N2ε1N1, where normalΔV1 and normalΔV2 are the values of band bending in Mg 2 Si and 4H‐SiC sides, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%