2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.110505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semidefinite Tests for Quantum Network Topologies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these techniques as well as concepts based on covariance matrices 28 , 29 and classical networks 23 , one can also derive bounds on the maximal GHZ fidelity achievable by network states. In fact, for network states holds, as explained in Supplementary Note 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using these techniques as well as concepts based on covariance matrices 28 , 29 and classical networks 23 , one can also derive bounds on the maximal GHZ fidelity achievable by network states. In fact, for network states holds, as explained in Supplementary Note 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the problem has been considered in the classical setting, such as the analysis of causal structures 15 – 17 or in the study of hidden variable models, where the hidden variables are not equally distributed between every party 18 – 24 . Concerning quantum correlations, several initial works appeared in the last year, suggesting slightly different definitions of network entanglement 25 – 28 . These have been further investigated 29 – 31 and methods from the classical realm have been extended to the quantum scenario 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these techniques as well as concepts based on covariance matrices [28,29] and classical networks [23], one can also derive bounds on the maximal GHZ fidelity achievable by network states. In fact, for network states…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the problem has been considered in the classical setting, such as the analysis of causal structures [15][16][17] or in the study of hidden variable models, where the hidden variables are not equally distributed between every party [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Concerning quantum correlations, several initial works appeared in the last year, suggesting slightly different definitions of network entanglement [25][26][27][28]. These have been further investigated [29][30][31] and methods from the classical realm have been extended to the quantum scenario [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key idea is to consider the various sources in the network to be statistically independent [7][8][9]. This independence leads to nonconvexity in the space of relevant correlations, undermining the use of preexisting tools and creating a need for new approaches, both analytically [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and numerically [19]. The network structure offers new interesting effects, such as the possibility to certify quantum nonlocality "without inputs" (i.e., a scenario where each party performs a fixed quantum measurement) [8,9,[20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%