2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-002-0141-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semipalatinsk test site: Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this present analysis, the risk of cardiovascular disease is described for the Semipalatinsk historical cohort, for which analyses have already been reported with respect to solid cancer mortality (11, 12). Between 1949 and 1989, more than 450 nuclear tests were conducted at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS), Kazakhstan (13). Areas inhabited by a total of more than 10,000 people northeast and southeast of SNTS were considerably affected by fallout mainly due to 118 atmospheric and surface nuclear tests carried out from 1949 to 1962.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this present analysis, the risk of cardiovascular disease is described for the Semipalatinsk historical cohort, for which analyses have already been reported with respect to solid cancer mortality (11, 12). Between 1949 and 1989, more than 450 nuclear tests were conducted at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS), Kazakhstan (13). Areas inhabited by a total of more than 10,000 people northeast and southeast of SNTS were considerably affected by fallout mainly due to 118 atmospheric and surface nuclear tests carried out from 1949 to 1962.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study was conducted 7–9 years following the exposure [ 27 ]. People in northeastern Kazakhstan adjacent to the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site had been exposed to radioactive fallout after nuclear tests conducted by the former Soviet Union [ 28 ]. One study examined the sex ratio in the offspring of these people as an indicator of the radiation effect on reproductive health and did not find any significant changes [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explosions conducted on the surface and in the atmosphere greatly influenced the radiation exposure conditions mainly due to 90 Sr, 137 Cs and 239,240 Pu for several hundred thousand people. Five atmospheric tests of September 1949, September 1951, August 1953 and March and August 1956 contributed to more than 85% of the doses to the population near the nuclear site (Gusev et al 1997 ; Grosche 2002 ), including both external and internal components as estimated from environmental measurements and from calculations made on the basis on fallout trajectories. However, there was a considerable heterogeneity in exposures even in the same settlements, and thus uncertainty in the individual exposures.…”
Section: Scenarios Involving Incorporation Of Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%