2010
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-10-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis

Abstract: BackgroundSenescent cells are well-recognized in the aging/degenerating human disc. Senescent cells are viable, cannot divide, remain metabolically active and accumulate within the disc over time. Molecular analysis of senescent cells in tissue offers a special challenge since there are no cell surface markers for senescence which would let one use fluorescence-activated cell sorting as a method for separating out senescent cells.MethodsWe employed a novel laser capture microdissection (LCM) design to selectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(The only assessment of senescence used in this study was SA-β-Gal positivity, which has its limitations as a technique and can fail to differentiate between cells which are senescent from those in crisis (Cristofalo, 2005)). In addition to this, senescence in a cell does not necessarily render the cell non-functional; it remains viable but may have an altered metabolism (Le Maitre et al, 2007;Gruber et al, 2010). This demonstration in vitro that the amount of serum and glucose which is available to disc cells directly infl uences their ability to both proliferate and survive within alginate beads could explain the presence of proliferating (Johnson et al, 2001), senescent (Roberts et al, 2006a), stressed (Sharp et al, 2009) and/or dying cells (Roberts et al, 2006b) in clusters in vivo in human intervertebral discs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The only assessment of senescence used in this study was SA-β-Gal positivity, which has its limitations as a technique and can fail to differentiate between cells which are senescent from those in crisis (Cristofalo, 2005)). In addition to this, senescence in a cell does not necessarily render the cell non-functional; it remains viable but may have an altered metabolism (Le Maitre et al, 2007;Gruber et al, 2010). This demonstration in vitro that the amount of serum and glucose which is available to disc cells directly infl uences their ability to both proliferate and survive within alginate beads could explain the presence of proliferating (Johnson et al, 2001), senescent (Roberts et al, 2006a), stressed (Sharp et al, 2009) and/or dying cells (Roberts et al, 2006b) in clusters in vivo in human intervertebral discs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular senescence, which is increased in aged and degenerated discs, is regulated by the MAPK pathways (Gruber et al, 2010;Gruber et al, 2007;Roberts et al, 2006). In several cell types, activation of p38 MAPK, for example, is used as a marker of senescence (Chen and Ames, 1994;Iwasa et al, 2003;Papadopoulou and Kletsas, 2011), while constitutive activation of p38 via MKK3 or MKK6 is reported to induce premature senescence via the upregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (Wang et al, 2002;Wu, 2004).…”
Section: K Wuertz Et Al Nf-b and Mapk In The Intervertebral Discsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An altered gene expression in senescent cells was recently reported [19]; therefore, the expression of transcripts coding for IVD cell phenotypic markers was assessed in degenerate discs in comparison to healthy discs. Currently, there are no specific markers for NP cells, and they have often been considered as chondrocyte-like cells due to ECM similarity.…”
Section: S16mentioning
confidence: 99%