2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbr.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensibilidade e especificidade dos instrumentos de avaliação da qualidade de vida na artrite reumatoide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is believed that since venous ulcer is a chronic disease, the outcomes should not be assessed exclusively with traditional epidemiological measures, emphasizing the importance of testing the sensitivity of the instruments used. 25 The CCVUQ-Br has already been translated to Portuguese and cross-culturally adapted for Brazil 6 and its reliability and validity have been tested 11 ; but its sensitivity still needs to be verified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is believed that since venous ulcer is a chronic disease, the outcomes should not be assessed exclusively with traditional epidemiological measures, emphasizing the importance of testing the sensitivity of the instruments used. 25 The CCVUQ-Br has already been translated to Portuguese and cross-culturally adapted for Brazil 6 and its reliability and validity have been tested 11 ; but its sensitivity still needs to be verified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Since there is no methodological definition for calculating sample size when validating sensitivity, the recommendation that studies of psychometric properties should not have samples of less than 50 individuals was followed. 13 A suggestion made in another study, 25 recommending that when analyzing questionnaires a minimum of 10 individuals should be assessed per domain, was also followed.…”
Section: Discussion Of Sensitivity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pontuação final é calculada por meio da média, sendo que a pontuação de 0 a 1 = dificuldade moderada, 1 a 2 = incapacidade moderada a grave e 2 a 3 = incapacidade grave a muito grave (20) . A aplicação deste instrumento dura cerca de cinco minutos e é amplamente utilizado para pacientes com AR em diferentes contextos (20) , sendo considerado um instrumento muito bom para avaliar o aspecto físico (21) .…”
Section: Repenunclassified