2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2015.0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensing‐throughput optimisation for multichannel cooperative spectrum sensing with imperfect reporting channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimal sensing duration was investigated [18]- [21] in an attempt to improve the overall system throughput, taking into account that a smaller number of SUs leads to a reduced sensing duration at the expense of reduced sensing diversity. Firouzabadi et al [22] considered wideband spectrum sensing and formulated the sensing problem as an optimization problem with the purpose of maximizing the opportunistic throughput of CRN by assuming the number of samples used to report the sensing decisions to the FC, the number of the sensing samples, the detection threshold and the overall sensing-plus-reporting time. Unlike previous work [18]- [22] whose optimization objectives were to maximize the secondary throughput, Zheng et al [23] proposed joint optimization of sensing time and the detection threshold with the aim of maximizing the energy efficiency of cognitive sensor networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal sensing duration was investigated [18]- [21] in an attempt to improve the overall system throughput, taking into account that a smaller number of SUs leads to a reduced sensing duration at the expense of reduced sensing diversity. Firouzabadi et al [22] considered wideband spectrum sensing and formulated the sensing problem as an optimization problem with the purpose of maximizing the opportunistic throughput of CRN by assuming the number of samples used to report the sensing decisions to the FC, the number of the sensing samples, the detection threshold and the overall sensing-plus-reporting time. Unlike previous work [18]- [22] whose optimization objectives were to maximize the secondary throughput, Zheng et al [23] proposed joint optimization of sensing time and the detection threshold with the aim of maximizing the energy efficiency of cognitive sensor networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where T is the total number of samples and y i is the sum of the squares of T Gaussian independent random variables. It is shown that υ i follows a central Chi square χ 2 c distribution with T degrees of freedom if H 0 is true, otherwise it follows non-central χ 2 nc distribution with T degrees of freedom and non-centrality parameter λ i . The power received by ith SU is λ i , which is de-…”
Section: Local Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensing decision of the local secondary user (SU) alone may not be reliable enough due to shadowing, multipath fading and time varying nature of wireless channels between SU and PU. To combat these issues, cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS) schemes have been proposed to take advantage of spatial diversity [1,2,3,4]. It can greatly increase the PD in shadowing channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensing decision of single SU alone may not be reliable due to fading channel and shadowing. To overcome these effects, cooperative spectrum sensing schemes have been considered to take advantage of spatial diversity [5–8], by which the probability of detection is greatly increased. A combining rule is applied at fusion centre (FC), in which the estimated energy reported by each SU is combined together to be compared with a threshold to decide the presence or the absence of PU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%