2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive T2 MRI Contrast Agents from the Rational Design of Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Surface Coatings

Abstract: Iron oxide nanoparticles are an FDA-approved and gadolinium-free alternative to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. While their magnetic cores are responsible for T 2 contrast, the nonmagnetic polymers at the particle interfaces can affect the diffusion of bulk water near the particles. We show here how this interaction can alter the relaxation dynamics of water protons and, consequently, the nanoparticle's contrast performance. Libraries of iron oxide nanocrystals of different core … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the slight increase in r 2 can be explained by the adsorption of proteins, which slows the diffusion of water protons around nanoparticles. [ 45 ] On the other hand, the decrease in r 1 and increase in r 2 of nanoparticles in the GSH solution can be attributed to the aggregation of particles, [ 46 ] as supported by the DLS results shown in Figure 3f. The aggregation of nanoparticles induces changes in the local magnetic field, leading to altered relaxation properties and subsequently affecting the measured relaxivities and T 1‐ and T 2‐weighted images (Figure 4c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Additionally, the slight increase in r 2 can be explained by the adsorption of proteins, which slows the diffusion of water protons around nanoparticles. [ 45 ] On the other hand, the decrease in r 1 and increase in r 2 of nanoparticles in the GSH solution can be attributed to the aggregation of particles, [ 46 ] as supported by the DLS results shown in Figure 3f. The aggregation of nanoparticles induces changes in the local magnetic field, leading to altered relaxation properties and subsequently affecting the measured relaxivities and T 1‐ and T 2‐weighted images (Figure 4c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, it must be noted that not only some parameters of ferrite nanoparticles such as the crystallinity, composition, size, morphology, and magnetic properties are responsible for T 2 contrast but also the characteristics of nonmagnetic polymers as coatings must be considered. Cho et al [ 32 ] have recently reported that higher T 2 relaxivity could be achieved by manipulating the features of surface coating and ferrite nanoparticles together.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, pores on the nanoparticles could restrict the diffusion of water molecules, which would lead to increased interactions between water protons and the MnO 2 nanoparticles and thus further enhance the T 2 relaxation. 83…”
Section: Mno2 For Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, pores on the nanoparticles could restrict the diffusion of water molecules, which would lead to increased interactions between water protons and the MnO 2 nanoparticles and thus further enhance the T 2 relaxation. 83 K. Deka et al 84 investigated manganese oxide nanoparticles infused in mesoporous three-dimensional carbon frames as MRI contrast agents. Their research revealed a remarkable increase in T 2 contrast by controlling the interaction between magnetic ions and water (Fig.…”
Section: Mno 2 For Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%