2000
DOI: 10.1109/7.826312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of dual-satellite geolocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover,Q y is generally not block diagonal, even if the TDOA and FDOA measurements from the source and calibration stations are independent to one another and Q y has a block diagonal structure. As a result, by taking the inverse of CRLB(γ o ) in (15) and comparing the result with (13a), we have that FIM(γ o ) = CRLB(γ o ) −1 can be considered as the FIM of γ o when accurate satellite locations are known but the measurements have an increased covariance matrixQ y . In other words, satellite location errors affect the estimation of the source position and time and frequency offsets via degrading and introducing extra correlation into the source and calibration measurements.…”
Section: Crlbmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover,Q y is generally not block diagonal, even if the TDOA and FDOA measurements from the source and calibration stations are independent to one another and Q y has a block diagonal structure. As a result, by taking the inverse of CRLB(γ o ) in (15) and comparing the result with (13a), we have that FIM(γ o ) = CRLB(γ o ) −1 can be considered as the FIM of γ o when accurate satellite locations are known but the measurements have an increased covariance matrixQ y . In other words, satellite location errors affect the estimation of the source position and time and frequency offsets via degrading and introducing extra correlation into the source and calibration measurements.…”
Section: Crlbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geolocation performance of the proposed algorithm is compared with the CRLB and that of two benchmark methods, namely an iterative ML estimator and a differential calibration (DC)-based estimator [15], [17]. The maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm estimates the source latitude and longitude θ o together with the time and frequency offsets α o and true satellite locations β o .…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omnitracs, Euteltracs, and Beidou are widely known position information providers utilizing GEO satellites [1][2][3]. General approach to fmd the location coordinates is employing the time difference of arrival (TDOA) of signals coming from each one of several GEO satellites [4][5][6][7][8]. Turksat has orbital rights at 31°, 42°, and 50° E longitude GEO orbits, where a constellation of three satellites can be designed to offer regional positioning service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method utilizes a priori knowledge on satellite orbital information. In [2,3], the authors have pointed out that accurate satellite ephemeris information is essential for the localization accuracy. To improve accuracy, an ephemeris calibration method is proposed in [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%