2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of spatio-temporal models describing nitrogen transfers, transformations and losses at the landscape scale

Abstract: Modelling complex systems such as agroecosystems often requires the quantification of a large number of input factors. Sensitivity analyses are useful to determine the appropriate spatial and temporal resolution of models and to reduce the number of factors to be measured or estimated accurately. Comprehensive spatial and temporal sensitivity analyses were applied to the NitroScape model, a deterministic spatially distributed model describing nitrogen transfers and transformations in rural landscapes. Simulati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that it is practically infeasible to perform a fully spatiotemporal sensitivity analysis for the IAP2 model. We, therefore, follow the works of Kebede et al (2015) and Savall et al (2019), where we aggregated the output data into six spatial extents (see Figure 5 European regions to reduce computational expense. We subsampled 600 data points from each of the five scenarios (baseline, SSP1, SSP3, SSP4, SSP5) and three timeslices (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) giving 9,000 (5 × 3 × 600) samples per each output.…”
Section: Application To Iap2 Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that it is practically infeasible to perform a fully spatiotemporal sensitivity analysis for the IAP2 model. We, therefore, follow the works of Kebede et al (2015) and Savall et al (2019), where we aggregated the output data into six spatial extents (see Figure 5 European regions to reduce computational expense. We subsampled 600 data points from each of the five scenarios (baseline, SSP1, SSP3, SSP4, SSP5) and three timeslices (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) giving 9,000 (5 × 3 × 600) samples per each output.…”
Section: Application To Iap2 Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In environmental science modeling, the extensions were used in various areas. For instance, a sensitivity analysis on the spatialized maximum water depth of a coastal flooding risk model in Perrin et al (2021); both a temporal and a spatial sensitivity analysis of a model describing nitrogen transfers in Ferrer Savall et al (2019); and a comparison between various sensitivity indices on a spatio-temporal radionuclide atmospheric dispersion model in De Lozzo & Marrel (2017). A sensitivity analysis was also performed for spatially distributed PESHMELBA outputs in Rouzies et al (2023) by calculating site specific sensitivity indices, then aggregating them to blocks via the definition provided in Gamboa et al (2014), but without studying the sensitivity of the dynamics of PESHMELBA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical analysis of the outputs variability along each basis functions along with the value of the associated sensitivity indices revealed in this case the impact of model inputs on up-down shift, left-right shift, symmetric kurtosis and tail-fattening components of the simulated curves. This approach was further extended by Lamboni et al [4,5] and Savall et al [6] applied it to a spatio-temporal model describing nitrogen transfers, transformations and losses at the landscape scale. A generic implementation using different bases such as eigenvectors, orthogonal polynomials, b-spline or principal component analysis can be found in Bidot et al [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%