2018
DOI: 10.1643/ot-18-059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analysis Using Site-Specific Demographic Parameters to Guide Research and Management of Threatened Eastern Massasaugas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Snakes in general have notoriously low encounter rates (Parker & Plummer, 1987; Steen, 2010). This problem is exacerbated for most tropical species, which may contribute to why evidence of transience is lacking (i.e., insufficient statistical power) in most snake studies (Bradke et al, 2018; Cayuela et al, 2019; Lelièvre et al, 2013; Sewell, Baker, & Griffiths, 2015), except in rare instances where transience has been detected and treated as a nuisance parameter to correct for bias in survival estimates (Jones, King, & Sutton, 2017; Koons, Birkhead, Boback, Williams, & Greene, 2009). We similarly used the transient effect to correct bias in survival; however, we also removed the effects of resident survival to estimate the proportion of transients and included supporting evidence to link this population‐level effect to an ontogenetic shift in diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snakes in general have notoriously low encounter rates (Parker & Plummer, 1987; Steen, 2010). This problem is exacerbated for most tropical species, which may contribute to why evidence of transience is lacking (i.e., insufficient statistical power) in most snake studies (Bradke et al, 2018; Cayuela et al, 2019; Lelièvre et al, 2013; Sewell, Baker, & Griffiths, 2015), except in rare instances where transience has been detected and treated as a nuisance parameter to correct for bias in survival estimates (Jones, King, & Sutton, 2017; Koons, Birkhead, Boback, Williams, & Greene, 2009). We similarly used the transient effect to correct bias in survival; however, we also removed the effects of resident survival to estimate the proportion of transients and included supporting evidence to link this population‐level effect to an ontogenetic shift in diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods that allow multiple rates to vary simultaneously, e.g. Latin hypercube sampling (Fordham et al, 2016;Bradke et al, 2018), may be better suited to capture nuances of parameter interactions. However, our approach still provides insight into how the future trajectories would change if the elicited demographic rates are incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%