1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.312465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and image quality of resists with electron-beam, ion-beam, and optical exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It takes into account the molecular structure of the photoresist, the photoacid generator presence, its initiation, diffusion and reaction to create deprotected sites as well as the dissolution of the exposed areas using a quasistatic fast dissolution algorithm [32][33][34]. Excellent process simulation and experimental studies have also appeared in the literature for the process effects on LER, such as aerial image contrast [35][36][37], shot noise [38], development process [39][40][41][42][43], lithographic process conditions [44][45][46][47][48], lithographic materials [32,33,[49][50][51][52][55][56][57][58][59] and others. Our simulation results are consistent with these studies.…”
Section: Line Edge Roughness (Ler) Resulting From Nanolithography Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It takes into account the molecular structure of the photoresist, the photoacid generator presence, its initiation, diffusion and reaction to create deprotected sites as well as the dissolution of the exposed areas using a quasistatic fast dissolution algorithm [32][33][34]. Excellent process simulation and experimental studies have also appeared in the literature for the process effects on LER, such as aerial image contrast [35][36][37], shot noise [38], development process [39][40][41][42][43], lithographic process conditions [44][45][46][47][48], lithographic materials [32,33,[49][50][51][52][55][56][57][58][59] and others. Our simulation results are consistent with these studies.…”
Section: Line Edge Roughness (Ler) Resulting From Nanolithography Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experimental measurements of surface roughness in resist materials have clarified its dependence on exposure dose, polymer chemical structure [22,23], the degree of constituent mixing [24], the variation of photo-chemical events due to shot noise [25][26][27][28], the quality of the mask and of the latent image [29][30][31][32], the solvent-polymer interactions, the polymer and the solvent molecular weight, and the acid diffusion range [33]. Finally, the polymer material itself in terms of monomer size, chain stiffness, glass transition temperature, affects greatly roughness also through the control of the mobility of the acid species, which seems so far the only mechanism by which both SR and LER could decrease [34,35].…”
Section: Resist Film Surface and Line-edge Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are based on cutting the sample and observing the side surface, SEM observation of tilted side [29], and quantification of LER for top-down SEM image analysis [10][11][12][13]29,32].…”
Section: Resist Film Surface and Line-edge Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, one of the most promising imaging systems is chemically amplified (CA) resists. [3,4] These resists have been studied intensively due to their high sensitivity, resulting from an acid-catalyzed deprotection pathway. A CA resist usually consists of a polymer matrix and a photoacid generator (PAG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%