2018
DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of βeff for MYRRHA using a Monte Carlo technique

Abstract: This paper presents a nuclear data sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the effective delayed neutron fraction b eff for critical and subcritical cores of the MYRRHA reactor using the continuous-energy Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code MCNP. The b eff sensitivities are calculated by the modified k-ratio method proposed by Chiba. Comparing the b eff sensitivities obtained with different scaling factors a introduced by Chiba shows that a value of a = 20 is the most suitable for the uncertainty quantificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 presents the flowchart of the developed method. -320 [33] 0.95944 ± 0.00018 - [34] system, the reference values of kkcode and βeff obtained in MCNP6.2 modeling are 0.956 0.00002 and 335.0 ± 2.0 pcm (percent mille, one-thousandth of a percent), respectiv These values are quite close to those published by other authors, especially by Romo et al [31]; see Table 1. The obtained kkcode and βeff values were fixed for further evalua of differences (Δ = kexp − kkcode), which are considered to be the final result.…”
Section: Calculationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Figure 5 presents the flowchart of the developed method. -320 [33] 0.95944 ± 0.00018 - [34] system, the reference values of kkcode and βeff obtained in MCNP6.2 modeling are 0.956 0.00002 and 335.0 ± 2.0 pcm (percent mille, one-thousandth of a percent), respectiv These values are quite close to those published by other authors, especially by Romo et al [31]; see Table 1. The obtained kkcode and βeff values were fixed for further evalua of differences (Δ = kexp − kkcode), which are considered to be the final result.…”
Section: Calculationssupporting
confidence: 86%