2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4724211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of 2-D turbulent flow past a D-shaped cylinder using global stability

Abstract: International audienceWe use adjoint-based gradients to analyze the sensitivity of turbulent wake past a D-shaped cylinder at Re = 13000. We assess the ability of a much smaller control cylinder in altering the shedding frequency, as predicted by the eigenfrequency of the most unstable global mode to the mean flow. This allows performing beforehand identification of the sensitive regions, i.e., without computing the actually controlled states. Our results obtained in the frame of 2-D, unsteady Reynolds-average… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
88
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the numerical results cannot adequately capture the details of the reverse flow region (as frequently occurs for RANS computations around bluff-body geometries) could question the physical relevance of their subsequent stability and sensitivity analyses. However, in the aforementioned work, 25 Meliga, Pujals and Serre have shown that, even if L R is underestimated by ≈30% (as in the present case), the global stability analysis still provides a fairly good prediction of the measured vortex-shedding frequency, and, moreover, a very good qualitative agreement in terms of the experimental frequency sensitivity map obtained by Parezanović and Cadot. 26 The comparison between the experimental and numerical mean flow could probably be improved by means of more advanced and computationally expensive techniques, such as LES or DES, which are, however, still far from the state-of-the-art of many industrial CFD applications.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that the numerical results cannot adequately capture the details of the reverse flow region (as frequently occurs for RANS computations around bluff-body geometries) could question the physical relevance of their subsequent stability and sensitivity analyses. However, in the aforementioned work, 25 Meliga, Pujals and Serre have shown that, even if L R is underestimated by ≈30% (as in the present case), the global stability analysis still provides a fairly good prediction of the measured vortex-shedding frequency, and, moreover, a very good qualitative agreement in terms of the experimental frequency sensitivity map obtained by Parezanović and Cadot. 26 The comparison between the experimental and numerical mean flow could probably be improved by means of more advanced and computationally expensive techniques, such as LES or DES, which are, however, still far from the state-of-the-art of many industrial CFD applications.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…25 In their study, the authors computed the time-averaged solution of the unsteady two-dimensional Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for the flow past a D-shaped cylinder at Re = 13 000 and then performed a sensitivity analysis of the obtained mean flow by linearising both the flow and the turbulence model equations. In analogy with the studies of the circular cylinder wake at low Reynolds numbers, the frequency control map computed by the authors for the considered turbulent flow was in close agreement with the one experimentally obtained by Parezanović and Cadot 26 through extensive measurements performed for different positions of the secondary cylinder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that a different approach could have been applied here, by performing the whole analysis around a turbulence model equation ('base flow approach'), such as Unsteady RANS with the Spalart-Allmaras model as in Meliga et al (2012b). In that case, the base flow would be a fixed point of the URANS equations, which approximates the mean flow within the limit of validity of the turbulence model.…”
Section: Eddy Viscosity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sensitivity studies of turbulent flows have been performed recently. The base flow approach was used by for example Meliga et al (2012b) to compute the sensitivity of a turbulent (Re = 13000) flow around a D-shaped bluff body, using URANS equations combined with a linearized Spalart-Allmaras model. The most sensitive region for passive control was successfully matched against experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%