2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2005.11.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of depolarized lidar signals to cloud and aerosol particle properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After visual inspection of all lidar profiles and as expected due to the low optical depth τ <0.1 (You et al, 2006), multiple scattering can be excluded for this case.…”
Section: Lidar Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…After visual inspection of all lidar profiles and as expected due to the low optical depth τ <0.1 (You et al, 2006), multiple scattering can be excluded for this case.…”
Section: Lidar Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This instrument synergy enables the retrieval of a wide range of aerosol and cloud products including: vertically-resolved aerosol and cloud layers, extinction, optical depth, aerosol and cloud type, cloud water phase, cirrus emissivity, and particle size and shape [36,37]. The horizontal resolution is 70 m with an instantaneous field of view (IFOV) sampled at 333 m intervals along the track, and the vertical resolution is 30 m.…”
Section: Instruments and Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing optical depth, the depolarization signal received from liquid clouds increases gradually from 0 to values in the range of non-spherical ice particles (e.g. a depolarization ratio of 30% at an optical depth of around 3 was calculated for the geometry of the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization, CALIOP, You et al, 2006). For liquid water clouds, the backscatter and the depolarization are positively correlated, while for ice clouds, the depolarization decreases with penetration into the cloud, as was observed for CALIPSO data (Hu et al, , 2007.…”
Section: Airborne Mobile Aerosol Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%