2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-019-04789-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of seasonal flood simulations to regional climate model spatial resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for this particular western U. S. region, there are examples of terrain-controlled precipitation patterns, precipitation type (snow vs. rain) and moisture transport features which should be, and in some cases clearly are, impacted by model resolution. Related RCM studies have suggested resolutions around ~ 12.5-km grid spacing better reproduce mean and extreme precipitation for almost all regions and seasons, citing that this resolution is needed to most effectively capitalize on the improved representation of orography (e.g., Prein et al 2016, Lucas-Pincher et al 2017), but that it may yet be insufficient for critical hydrologic applications (e.g., Castaneda-Gonzalez et al 2019;He et al 2019;Smiatek and Kunstmann 2019;Xu et al 2019). The results of this study support the general notion that ~ 50-km grid spacing is sufficient for resolving regional-scale effects resulting from large-scale precipitation systems that characterize the climate of many locations in the western United States, but that smaller-scale physical processes critical for determining extreme precipitation, as well as land-surface processes controlling snow-dominated regions likely require finer grid spacing.…”
Section: Interpretation In the Context Of Other Climate Projection Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for this particular western U. S. region, there are examples of terrain-controlled precipitation patterns, precipitation type (snow vs. rain) and moisture transport features which should be, and in some cases clearly are, impacted by model resolution. Related RCM studies have suggested resolutions around ~ 12.5-km grid spacing better reproduce mean and extreme precipitation for almost all regions and seasons, citing that this resolution is needed to most effectively capitalize on the improved representation of orography (e.g., Prein et al 2016, Lucas-Pincher et al 2017), but that it may yet be insufficient for critical hydrologic applications (e.g., Castaneda-Gonzalez et al 2019;He et al 2019;Smiatek and Kunstmann 2019;Xu et al 2019). The results of this study support the general notion that ~ 50-km grid spacing is sufficient for resolving regional-scale effects resulting from large-scale precipitation systems that characterize the climate of many locations in the western United States, but that smaller-scale physical processes critical for determining extreme precipitation, as well as land-surface processes controlling snow-dominated regions likely require finer grid spacing.…”
Section: Interpretation In the Context Of Other Climate Projection Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we only illustrate a limited application of the reversed impact chain framework. The estimation of local climate impacts requires multivariate projections with high spatial and temporal resolution (Castaneda-Gonzalez et al 2019). A promising avenue for extension are modular setups that play an increasingly important role in climate science with the developments of more and more Earth system and impact model emulators building on statistical (Beusch et al 2021;Nath et al 2022;Quilcaille et al 2022;Liu et al 2023;Tebaldi, Snyder, and Dorheim 2022) or machine learning approaches (Abramoff et al 2023) allowing for down-scaling to very high local resolution (Quesada-Chacón, Barfus, and Bernhofer 2022).…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an extremely simple model (its name stands for Extremely Simplified Hydrological Model in French) and includes its own PET and snow routines (Fortin & Turcotte, 2007). Nonetheless, MOHYSE and the other three models have shown overall good performance over the study domain in multiple studies (Arsenault et al, 2015; Castaneda‐Gonzalez et al, 2019). Due to the number of catchments, no distributed or physically based models were used in this database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%