2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2005)131:3(238)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of the Food and Agriculture Organization Penman–Monteith Evapotranspiration Estimates to Alternative Procedures for Estimation of Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that the model was unfit for use under temperate conditions when the original calibration coefficients were used. At 12 • 57 N latitude Nandagiri and Kovoor (2005) similarly found the model predictions had a high bias and scatter when the results were compared to Allen et al (1998). Irmak et al (2003) only tested the model at mid-latitude sites.…”
Section: Multiple Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The results indicated that the model was unfit for use under temperate conditions when the original calibration coefficients were used. At 12 • 57 N latitude Nandagiri and Kovoor (2005) similarly found the model predictions had a high bias and scatter when the results were compared to Allen et al (1998). Irmak et al (2003) only tested the model at mid-latitude sites.…”
Section: Multiple Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…ET 0 was currently predicted by the HS equation, which is often preferred to other more complicated methods since it requires only maximum and minimum air temperatures and is reasonably accurate [48]. The ET 0 estimated by the HS equation have been compared to the ET 0 computed with the Penman-Monteith equation (PM-ET 0 ) equation [11], using full datasets, or to grass lysimeter data, indicating that the HS method performs well in most climatic regions, with the exception of humid areas [49][50][51][52]. The used version of the HS equation was suggested for Mediterranean coastal areas by [39], who recognized its superiority over other temperature methods in water limited ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimate for Δ using T a only is shown in Equation (11), which has been widely used to calculate λE in the PM method (Allen et al [30], Xu and Singh [33], Nandagiri and Kovoor [14], Donatelli et al [34], etc. ).…”
Section: The Penman-monteith Methods For Calculating Latent Heat Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies conducted sensitivity analyses on parameterization and appropriate adaptation of the PM method (Thom and Oliver [7], De Bruin and Holtslag [8], Shuttleworth and Wallace [9], Allen [10], Kustas et al [11], Moran et al [6], Alves and Pereira [12], Gavin and Agnew [13], Nandagiri and Kovoor [14], Allen et al [15], Gong et al [16], Zhao et al [17], etc.). Otles and Gutowski [18] studied atmospheric stability effects on the PM method and compared the evapotranspiration from PM to the Bowen-ratio and lysimeter data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%