2015
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/22/8833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of tumor motion simulation accuracy to lung biomechanical modeling approaches and parameters

Abstract: Finite element analysis (FEA)-based biomechanical modeling can be used to predict lung respiratory motion. In this technique, elastic models and biomechanical parameters are two important factors that determine modeling accuracy. We systematically evaluated the effects of lung and lung tumor biomechanical modeling approaches and related parameters to improve the accuracy of motion simulation of lung tumor center of mass (TCM) displacements. Experiments were conducted with four-dimensional computed tomography (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(61 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The optimized incompressibility factors of the lung material during biomechanical simulation are shown in the last column. The Euclidean landmark motion errors, derived from the biomechanical modeling using the real SDVFs (by deformable registration of 4D-CT) and the predicted SDVFs, are shown in the third and fourth columns, respectively (Table V).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…28 The optimized incompressibility factors of the lung material during biomechanical simulation are shown in the last column. The Euclidean landmark motion errors, derived from the biomechanical modeling using the real SDVFs (by deformable registration of 4D-CT) and the predicted SDVFs, are shown in the third and fourth columns, respectively (Table V).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 In this approach, the uncoupled Mooney-Rivlin material model was used, and the whole lung was simulated as homogenous material. The incompressibility of the whole lung (k-factor in last column of Table V) was optimized iteratively for each patient to minimize the overall landmark errors.…”
Section: F Evaluating the Predicted Sdvfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach usually works well for high-contrast regions [4], [6], [7] but its accuracy is often limited in low-contrast regions with subtle intensity differences [5]. In addition, the solved deformation fields may not be biomechanically realistic because the deformation fails to consider the elastic properties of anatomical structures [17]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung motion prediction, including tumors and OARs, has been studied using more advanced physical approaches, including biomechanical modeling with the finite element method (25, 26), motion vector modeling with deformable image registration (DIR) (27, 28), hybrid modeling with biomechanics and DIR (29, 30), and statistical modeling with respiratory parameters (31-33). Although the prediction accuracy might be clinically acceptable, the major limitations included a lack of real-time performance owing to the complex, iterative computation and lack of adaptations to changes of breathing behaviors or irregularities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%