1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01462.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity to Drugs of Australian Leptospiral Serotypes

Abstract: The in vitro susceptibilities to antibiotics of stock strains of various Australian leptospiral serotypes were established. Leptospira pomona was highly susceptible to penicillin and erythromycin, susceptible to streptomycin and tetracyclines, but resistant to chloramphenicol and novobiocin. In general, the twelve serotypes tested were susceptible to streptomycin, penicillin and tetracycline, but L. icterohaemorrhagiae, L. canicola and L. zanoni were more resistant than the other serotypes, especially to penic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are not entirely in accord with findings on the sensitivity of leptospirae to antibiotics in vitro (Spradbrow, 1963). In general, these organisms were susceptible to very low concentrations of erythromycin and of penicillin, moderate concentrations of the tetracyclines and of streptomycin, but only to high concentrations of novobiocin, and they showed complete resistance to chloramphenicol.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…These observations are not entirely in accord with findings on the sensitivity of leptospirae to antibiotics in vitro (Spradbrow, 1963). In general, these organisms were susceptible to very low concentrations of erythromycin and of penicillin, moderate concentrations of the tetracyclines and of streptomycin, but only to high concentrations of novobiocin, and they showed complete resistance to chloramphenicol.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The antileptospiral effects of the penicillin-streptomycin and polymyxin B-dihydrostreptomycin treatments were relatively rapid when compared with those of neomycin and chloramphenicol. The observed inhibitory effect of chloramphenicol on leptospires in tissue cultures was surprising in view of the reported refractiveness of leptospires to the action of this antibiotic at comparable and higher concentrations (Dunn and Thompson, 1953); Spadbrow, 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…With the exception of chloramphenicol, the known growth-inhibitory substances for leptospires in the medium were the tested antibiotics: penicillin-streptomycin, neomycin, and polymyxin B-dihydrostreptomycin. These antibiotics were present in concentrations well above the known in vitro bacteriostatic or bactericidal levels (Felsenfeld et al, 1950;Kolochine and Mailloux, 1962;Spadbrow, 1963;Van Thiel, 1957), and were responsible for the elimination of leptospires from tissue cultures. The antileptospiral effects of the penicillin-streptomycin and polymyxin B-dihydrostreptomycin treatments were relatively rapid when compared with those of neomycin and chloramphenicol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%