Causal interactions within complex systems can be analyzed at multiple spatial and temporal scales. For example, the brain can be analyzed at the level of neurons, neuronal groups, and areas, over tens, hundreds, or thousands of milliseconds. It is widely assumed that, once a micro level is fixed, macro levels are fixed too, a relation called supervenience. It is also assumed that, although macro descriptions may be convenient, only the micro level is causally complete, because it includes every detail, thus leaving no room for causation at the macro level. However, this assumption can only be evaluated under a proper measure of causation. Here, we use a measure [effective information (EI)] that depends on both the effectiveness of a system's mechanisms and the size of its state space: EI is higher the more the mechanisms constrain the system's possible past and future states. By measuring EI at micro and macro levels in simple systems whose micro mechanisms are fixed, we show that for certain causal architectures EI can peak at a macro level in space and/or time. This happens when coarse-grained macro mechanisms are more effective (more deterministic and/or less degenerate) than the underlying micro mechanisms, to an extent that overcomes the smaller state space. Thus, although the macro level supervenes upon the micro, it can supersede it causally, leading to genuine causal emergence-the gain in EI when moving from a micro to a macro level of analysis.I n science, it is usually assumed that, the better one can characterize the detailed causal mechanisms of a complex system, the more one can understand how the system works. At times, it may be convenient to resort to a "macro"-level description, either because not all of the "micro"-level data are available, or because a rough model may suffice for one's purposes. However, a complete understanding of how a system functions, and the ability to predict its behavior precisely, would seem to require the full knowledge of causal interactions at the micro level. For example, the brain can be characterized at a macro scale of brain regions and pathways, a meso scale of local populations of neurons such as minicolumns and their connectivity, and a micro scale of neurons and their synapses (1). With the goal of a complete mechanistic understanding of the brain, ambitious programs have been launched with the aim of modeling its micro scale (2).The reductionist approach common in science has been successful not only in practice, but has also been supported by strong theoretical arguments. The chief argument starts from the intuitive notion that, when the properties of micro-level physical mechanisms of a system are fixed, so are the properties of all its macro levels-a relation called "supervenience" (3). In turn, this relation is usually taken to imply that the micro mechanisms do all of the causal work, i.e., the micro level is causally complete. This leaves no room for any causal contribution at the macro level; otherwise, there would be "multiple causation" (4). This ...