2007
DOI: 10.1109/ssdbm.2007.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Scheduling for Aggregate Monitoring inWireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence our proposed PCCFI method outperforms the SDA [16], PAS [17], DAS [18], SAS [19], WIRES-BSPT [15], and First Fit methods by 30-50%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Hence our proposed PCCFI method outperforms the SDA [16], PAS [17], DAS [18], SAS [19], WIRES-BSPT [15], and First Fit methods by 30-50%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In WSNs', Networks are divided into three categories, first is tree based [4], second is cluster based [5], and third is hybrid topology. In tree based structure, the root of tree is called sink node.…”
Section: Network Topology and Communication Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some focus on computing simple functions over the readings of sensor networks, e.g., [15], [19], [24]. Madden et al develop Tiny AGggregation (TAG), a generic aggregation service for sensor networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Przydatek et al [19] focus on the security aspects of data aggregation. Trading aggregation accuracy with communication cost is studied in [24]. Giridhar and Kumar [9] characterize the rate at which certain classes of functions can be computed and communicated in sensor networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%