2012
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2011.2170170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Selection in Distributed Multiple-Radar Architectures for Localization: A Knapsack Problem Formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
150
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Algorithm 2, the proposed MFMLS_OAT algorithm is presented to improve the resource utilization for problem (17). Similar to MFMLS algorithm, the MFMLS_OAT algorithm allows the radar system to ensure the demands of hot targets firstly and then improve the tracking accuracy for suspicious targets with the remaining resources.…”
Section: Mfmls_oat Algorithm For Low Location Estimation Msementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Algorithm 2, the proposed MFMLS_OAT algorithm is presented to improve the resource utilization for problem (17). Similar to MFMLS algorithm, the MFMLS_OAT algorithm allows the radar system to ensure the demands of hot targets firstly and then improve the tracking accuracy for suspicious targets with the remaining resources.…”
Section: Mfmls_oat Algorithm For Low Location Estimation Msementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some antennas may have greater impacts on system performance than others [16], affected by the different propagation paths, target reflection coefficients, and topologies of system with respect to targets. Reasonable antenna selection can maximize antenna utilization and minimize computational complexity and communication cost among stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar greedy techniques have been applied to radar arrays [17,18] where the change of the MMSE is used for target detection. It should also be noted that the utility proposed in our framework differs from other definitions such as [11,19,20] which rely on the concept of submodularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%