2013
DOI: 10.1177/1059712313482802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorimotor enactivism and temporal experience

Abstract: O'Regan and Noë's sensorimotor approach rejects the old-fashioned view that perceptual experience in humans depends solely on the activation of internal representations. Reflecting a wealth of empirical work, for example active vision, the approach suggests that perceiving is, instead, a matter of bodily exploration of the outside environment. To this end, the approach says the perceiver must deploy knowledge of sensorimotor contingencies, the ways sense input changes with movement by the perceiver or object p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms behind this coupling are complex and are not yet totally understood, with conflicting theoretical proposals that revolve around the notions of prediction and anticipation on the one hand, and reactive behavior and feedback on the other. A lot is to be expected here from current research on sensorimotor synchronization [75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] and predictive coding [83][84][85][86], as well as from older theories of central and peripheral theories of motor control [87][88][89][90]. The latter revolves around the question of whether motor control is dependent upon the nervous system to coordinate movement through instructions from its central components-memory representations or motor programs that provide the basis for organizing, initiating, and carrying out the intended actions, as exemplified in the "schema theory" of motor control [91] (see also [88])-or by information that arises from the dynamic interactions between the mover, the task, and the environment through peripheral feedback, and which is considered as movement-related specifications that can vary from one action to another.…”
Section: Alignment and Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms behind this coupling are complex and are not yet totally understood, with conflicting theoretical proposals that revolve around the notions of prediction and anticipation on the one hand, and reactive behavior and feedback on the other. A lot is to be expected here from current research on sensorimotor synchronization [75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] and predictive coding [83][84][85][86], as well as from older theories of central and peripheral theories of motor control [87][88][89][90]. The latter revolves around the question of whether motor control is dependent upon the nervous system to coordinate movement through instructions from its central components-memory representations or motor programs that provide the basis for organizing, initiating, and carrying out the intended actions, as exemplified in the "schema theory" of motor control [91] (see also [88])-or by information that arises from the dynamic interactions between the mover, the task, and the environment through peripheral feedback, and which is considered as movement-related specifications that can vary from one action to another.…”
Section: Alignment and Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On such a view, the occluded objects are understood implicitly in experience as ‘available to perception through appropriate movement’ (Noë, 2012, p. 58, italics removed). Experience is therefore construed not as a linear succession of static representational states, but as a temporally extended process of environmental probing (Silverman, 2013). On an ECM interpretation, the exercise of such embodied capacities and the implicated sensorimotor dynamics are as constitutive of the experience as the accompanying brain processes.…”
Section: The Anticipatory Structure Of Perception and Action-orientedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, enactive approaches can be easily linked with some biological disciplines and fields, one of which is biosemiotics (Favareau 2010). It is also very sensitive to temporal dimensions of human interactions on multiple scales (Silverman 2013).…”
Section: Levels and Time Scales Of The Social Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%