2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory neural hearing loss after concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
60
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our short-term study further confirmed that the severity of the SNHL is strongly related to the irradiation-absorbed dose-volume; however, there are other studies showing the effects of radiation as well as chemoradiotherapy regime on the hearing loss [6,7]. There are several variables that could have an effect on the risk of developing hearing loss side effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Our short-term study further confirmed that the severity of the SNHL is strongly related to the irradiation-absorbed dose-volume; however, there are other studies showing the effects of radiation as well as chemoradiotherapy regime on the hearing loss [6,7]. There are several variables that could have an effect on the risk of developing hearing loss side effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There are still arguments about the dosage of cisplatin used in concomitant chemoradiation for head and neck cancers despite several very large, prospective, randomized trials using cisplatin at 100 mg/m 2 proving to have better survival rate than RT alone. Oh et al [16] reported that low dose cisplatin had no additive effect on ototoxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients who received one cycle of neoadjuvant 5-FU (1000 mg/m 2 ) and cisplatin (20 mg/m 2 ) followed by low dose cisplatin every 3 weeks for 2-3 cycles concurrently during RT. They maintained that the cisplatin dose was too low to induce SNHL by itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant increase in bone conduction threshold at 4 kHz and PTA over 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz was reported 1 and 2 years after RT delivered with concurrent and adjuvant Cisplatin (Low et al 2006). Conversely, no such increase has been seen in patients treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin (Kwong et al 1996;Oh et al 2004;Ho et al 1999) ( Table 9). Though the synergistic effects of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and RT remain debatable, to reduce toxicity restricting the total dose received by the inner ear to a minimal level when delivered with cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been suggested (Combs et al 2006), as has reducing the radiation dose to components of the auditory system to less than 45 Gy (30 Gy more conservatively) , and substituting a less ototoxic agent such as carboplatin (Jacobs et al 1989).…”
Section: Chemoradiationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The dose response relationship for the inner ear has been evaluated in a number of prospective and retrospective studies (Honore et al 2002;Pan et al 2005;Oh et al 2004;Chen et al 2006;van der Putten et al 2006). At a total dose as low as 30 Gy for fractionated RT to the head-and-neck region (Raaijmakers and Engelen 2002), SNHL, CHL, or mixed hearing loss (Leach 1965) has been occasionally reported in the literature.…”
Section: Total Dose To the Inner Earmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation