1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01138492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory performance of blind mexican cave fish after destruction of the canal neuromasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. However, all the SN thresholds calculated for the blind cave fish of the AbdelLatif et al (Abdel-Latif et al, 1990) experiment are extremely low as compared with those numbers obtained for other experiments. This raises concerns regarding claims that the SNs were used for detecting the dipole source, especially since these otophysan fish have pressure-sensitive ears that could have easily detected the pressure changes of a nearby dipole source of the same frequency (Montgomery et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Journal Of Experimental Biologymentioning
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. However, all the SN thresholds calculated for the blind cave fish of the AbdelLatif et al (Abdel-Latif et al, 1990) experiment are extremely low as compared with those numbers obtained for other experiments. This raises concerns regarding claims that the SNs were used for detecting the dipole source, especially since these otophysan fish have pressure-sensitive ears that could have easily detected the pressure changes of a nearby dipole source of the same frequency (Montgomery et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Journal Of Experimental Biologymentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Alternately, Abdel-Latif et al showed that blind cave fish could orient toward a vibrating sphere even when the CN subsystem was disabled, indicating that the fish were relying on the SN subsystem to locate the sphere (Abdel-Latif et al, 1990). Their experimental parameters were a=2.5 mm, r=20 cm, f=10-90 Hz and displacement amplitudes = 0.2-1.4 mm.…”
Section: Applying the Oscillatory Boundary Layer Solution To Real Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biological significance of lateral line systems, however, can only be recognised by studying the behaviour in its natural context (Bleckmann, 1993). The lateral line system has been shown to be involved in many different behaviours such as detection and localisation of stationary objects (Abdel-Latif et al, 1990), obstacle entrainment and rheotaxis in fast-flowing streams (Baker and Montgomery, 1999;Montgomery et al, , 2003Sutterlin and Waddy, 1975) and intraspecific communication such as schooling (Partridge and Pitcher, 1980;Pitcher et al, 1976) and mating (Satou et al, 1993(Satou et al, , 1994. Lateral line involvement was also shown in different feeding behaviours of fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superficial neuromasts measure the velocity of the flow very close to the skin, while canal neuromasts measure the water pressure difference between adjacent pores in the canal (Denton and Gray, 1983;Denton and Gray, 1988;Denton and Gray, 1989;Denton and Gray, 1982;Kroese and Schellart, 1992). Although surface and canal neuromasts have overlapping functions, blind cave fish can still locate objects even with disabled surface neuromasts (Montgomery et al, 2001), whereas the ability of these fish to navigate with disabled canal neuromasts is impaired or even lost (Abdel-Latif et al, 1990). The pressure difference δp between two adjacent pores of the lateral line is generally considered as a hydrodynamic signal, which also varies with the distance to a wall h (Windsor et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%