2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information (ICETCI) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icetci55101.2022.9832284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Analysis for YouTube Educational Videos Using Machine and Deep Learning Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVC and RF classifiers gave an accuracy of 96% while 74% was the worst accuracy given by the KNN classifier using the under-sampling technique. DL model for oversampling and SOMTE technique gave 96% and 89% accuracy was obtained for manually balanced data set [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SVC and RF classifiers gave an accuracy of 96% while 74% was the worst accuracy given by the KNN classifier using the under-sampling technique. DL model for oversampling and SOMTE technique gave 96% and 89% accuracy was obtained for manually balanced data set [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Oversampling by SMOTE is quite famous in literature but SMOTE technique can be applied after the vectorization of the data. As this research required the same data for all three techniques, oversampling was done with repetition as [18] suggests that both SMOTE and oversampling techniques evaluated similar results. The annotated data had 1175 positive comments 165 negative and 660 neutral comments.…”
Section: Minority Oversamplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It www.ijacsa.thesai.org offers an integrated solution for the challenges of preprocessing Arabic text on social media. This was undertaken to investigate the performance metrics as given in [23,24,25,26,27,28,29] and validates the proposed model for small-and large-scale datasets. Disambiguation using the deep learning techniques with the Arabic corpus is presented in [30].…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the third phase, the classification process is carried out by using the most common MLCs and DL approaches used scholarly [28,29]. In MCLs, the most common classifiers used are the Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Classifier, Neural Net,poly SVM, Decision Tree, AdaBoost, Nearest Neighbors, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Naive Bayes, and QDA.…”
Section: Classification Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents and demonstrates the results of the experiments of most popular classifiers used in our model [28,29]. The experiments evaluated in this section used a confusion matrix to show the detection performance of the models.…”
Section: A Machine Learning Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%