2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02178-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel node navigation surgery in cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it was not analyzed in the present study, a meta-analysis on disease-free survival and other oncological outcomes was recently conducted by Parpinel et al, disclosing no differences in survival and 5-year disease-free survival between SLN mapping and pelvic lymphadenectomy [38]. Regarding the safety of the technique, a recent review from Chiyoda et al found out that sentinel lymph node navigation surgery with Technetium (with or without blue dye) or ICG was safe in SLN assessment (reducing surgical complications and improving SLN detection), but without relevant information regarding the long-term safety of SLN harvest [39]. Adequately detecting the three types of metastases (MAC-MIC-ITCs) is of importance since MICs and MACs have clinical impacts (but the prognostic impact of ITCs remains unclear), as a recent meta-analysis disclosed [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it was not analyzed in the present study, a meta-analysis on disease-free survival and other oncological outcomes was recently conducted by Parpinel et al, disclosing no differences in survival and 5-year disease-free survival between SLN mapping and pelvic lymphadenectomy [38]. Regarding the safety of the technique, a recent review from Chiyoda et al found out that sentinel lymph node navigation surgery with Technetium (with or without blue dye) or ICG was safe in SLN assessment (reducing surgical complications and improving SLN detection), but without relevant information regarding the long-term safety of SLN harvest [39]. Adequately detecting the three types of metastases (MAC-MIC-ITCs) is of importance since MICs and MACs have clinical impacts (but the prognostic impact of ITCs remains unclear), as a recent meta-analysis disclosed [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although lymph node involvement in para-aortic site deteriorated the outcomes of cervical cancer patients, the benefit of para-aortic lymph nodes dissection needed further validation (Cho et al 2020 ). Owing to the potential complications of lymph node resection, SLN biopsy or selective lymph node dissection was possibly considered as one of the standard therapies for early cervical cancer (Chiyoda et al 2022 ; Niu et al 2022 ; Poddar and Maheshwari 2021 ). Consequently, understanding the pattern of LNM contributed to performing lymph node related surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors that threatens women’s health worldwide. Surgery remains one of the main treatment methods [ 1 ]. Patients with cervical cancer have to face the specific adverse effects of the cancer and surgical treatment that are not found in other cancers, which might lead to a negative impact on supportive care needs [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%