2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-015-9307-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SentiTurkNet: a Turkish polarity lexicon for sentiment analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors claimed it as a first lexical resource that could assist in developing sentiment analysis systems in the Italian language. Dehkharghani et al (2016) in their work sentiment lexicons developed the first Turkish sentiment lexicon using semiautomatic approach by assigning sentiment scores to all synsets in the Turkish WordNet using SentiWordNet and pointwise mutual information technique. The results depicted that polarity scores assigned by their lexicon are more accurate as compared with baseline methods.…”
Section: Sentiment Lexicons In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors claimed it as a first lexical resource that could assist in developing sentiment analysis systems in the Italian language. Dehkharghani et al (2016) in their work sentiment lexicons developed the first Turkish sentiment lexicon using semiautomatic approach by assigning sentiment scores to all synsets in the Turkish WordNet using SentiWordNet and pointwise mutual information technique. The results depicted that polarity scores assigned by their lexicon are more accurate as compared with baseline methods.…”
Section: Sentiment Lexicons In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned approaches for sentiment lexicon generation are widely used for creating sentiment to process English text. Several studies (Afraz, Muhammad, & Martinez-Enriquez, 2011;Awais, 2012;Badaro, Baly, Hajj, Habash, & El-Hajj, 2014;Bakliwal, Arora, & Varma, 2012;Dashtipour et al, 2016;Dehkharghani, Saygin, Yanikoglu, & Oflazer, 2016) have been conducted to perform sentiment analysis in languages other than English; till date, most of the research efforts made in the area of sentiment analysis deal with English text (Mukhtar et al, 2017). This is due to the fact that extraction and analysis of sentiments from text need a rich collection of lexical resources of that language.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our polarity lexicon is the first comprehensive Turkish lexicon established by Dehkharghani et al (2014) by using several resources both in English as well as in Turkish SentiTurkNet. In building this lexicon, authors did not translate SentiWordNet to Turkish as done in (Türkmenoglu and Tantug, 2014), rather they established the lexicon using NLP techniques and available resources such as Turkish WordNet (Bilgin et al, 2004), English WordNet (Miller, 1995), SentiWordNet (Esuli and Sebastiani, 2006) and SenticNet (Cambria et al, 2010).…”
Section: Polarity Lexiconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate the lexicons of various sizes, we started with the polarity values of the seed words, obtained from the SentiTurkNet (Dehkharghani et al, 2014), then the rest of the new lexicon was filled by randomly choosing the necessary number of synsets from the lexicon. To obtain more robust results, we randomly chose the rest of the words in the new lexicon five times and obtained the results and computed an average over these.…”
Section: Lexicon Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of normalization, preprocessing, stemming, morphological analyses and POS tagging are tested and 73%-79% accuracy on the dataset with about 6% relative improvement by using empirically determined parameters are obtained. Dehkharghani et al [31] have semi-automatically generated a Turkish polarity resource, SentiTurkNet, and experimented on Turkish movie reviews. They have used three classifiers that are Logistic Regression (LR), Feedforward Neural Networks, and SVM with sequential minimal optimization algorithm and obtained 91.11% accuracy as the best when classifying synsets into the three polarities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%