2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating intentional inhibition of prepotent responses and resistance to proactive interference in alcohol-dependent individuals

Abstract: These findings suggest that alcohol-dependence is mainly associated with impaired capacity to intentionally suppress irrelevant prepotent response information. Control of proactive interference from memory is preserved. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, impairments in executive functions (other than the cognitive control processes we will be focusing on), such as attention, visuospatial abilities, decision making, abstract thinking, rule acquisition, rule shifting, flexibility, planning, verbal fluency, and initiation of goal-directed behavior, have been demonstrated (Brown et al, 2000; Sullivan et al, 2000b; Ratti et al, 2002; Sullivan et al, 2002; Blume et al, 2005; Goudriaan et al, 2006; Rupp et al, 2006; Chanraud et al, 2007; de Wit, 2009; Kopera et al, 2012; Montgomery et al, 2012; Noel et al, 2012; Wollenweber et al, 2012; Thoma et al, 2013). Two domains even more directly related to cognitive control are error monitoring (Ridderinkhof et al, 2004b; Mayer et al, 2011) and oculomotor inhibition (Weafer et al, 2011; Noel et al, 2013), which we will not be covering in any detail in this article either.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, impairments in executive functions (other than the cognitive control processes we will be focusing on), such as attention, visuospatial abilities, decision making, abstract thinking, rule acquisition, rule shifting, flexibility, planning, verbal fluency, and initiation of goal-directed behavior, have been demonstrated (Brown et al, 2000; Sullivan et al, 2000b; Ratti et al, 2002; Sullivan et al, 2002; Blume et al, 2005; Goudriaan et al, 2006; Rupp et al, 2006; Chanraud et al, 2007; de Wit, 2009; Kopera et al, 2012; Montgomery et al, 2012; Noel et al, 2012; Wollenweber et al, 2012; Thoma et al, 2013). Two domains even more directly related to cognitive control are error monitoring (Ridderinkhof et al, 2004b; Mayer et al, 2011) and oculomotor inhibition (Weafer et al, 2011; Noel et al, 2013), which we will not be covering in any detail in this article either.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tasks used to measure interference control processes include the Stroop (Golden, 1976), Simon, flanker (Roberts and Hall, 2008), and Hayling tasks (Burgess and Shallice, 1996; Noel et al, 2012, 2013). In a task of interference control, there are generally trials where the distractor encourages the same response as the target (congruent) and other trials where the distractor encourages a different response as the target (incongruent), and performance is often measured as a difference measure between congruent and incongruent trials.…”
Section: Cognitive Control Processes Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…El test de Stroop Clásico, a través de su valor de interferencia, mide el funcionamiento del lóbulo frontal (Reeve & Schandler, 2001) cognitiva (Fisher, Freed & Corkin, 1990) y la capacidad de inhibición de los sujetos, en concreto la resistencia a la interferencia de los estímulos irrelevantes (Milham, Banich & Barad, 2003). En este sentido, los resultados en el test de Stroop Clásico en nuestro estudio, replican los resultados obtenidos mediante el test de Stroop Clásico en pacientes con dependencia alcohólica (p.e., Nöel et al, 2012), apoyando la existencia de un déficit de los procesos inhibitorios en estos pacientes. Asimismo, los análisis de correlaciones realizados en nuestro estudio indican una asociación significativa entre la interferencia generada en las diferentes condiciones de procesamiento evaluadas, de modo que una mayor interferencia general en el test de Stroop Clásico se encuentra asociada a mayores niveles de interferencia en los test de Stroop específicos para material neutro y de alcohol.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified