2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation and stabilization of arsenic in copper smelting wastewater by zinc slag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No diffraction peaks of scorodite or iron arsenate were detected in XRD analysis, probably because the low crystallinity of the iron arsenate precipitate or the weaker signal of amorphous iron arsenate were shielded by gypsum. These findings are consistent with the results of Duan and Li [ 26 , 43 ]. The difference is that the diffraction peaks of scorodite were observed in the precipitation of the reaction for 12 h by Li et al, indicating that the formation of scorodite crystals takes some time; however, in our study, the formation of scorodite was not observed, which may be caused by the different reaction conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No diffraction peaks of scorodite or iron arsenate were detected in XRD analysis, probably because the low crystallinity of the iron arsenate precipitate or the weaker signal of amorphous iron arsenate were shielded by gypsum. These findings are consistent with the results of Duan and Li [ 26 , 43 ]. The difference is that the diffraction peaks of scorodite were observed in the precipitation of the reaction for 12 h by Li et al, indicating that the formation of scorodite crystals takes some time; however, in our study, the formation of scorodite was not observed, which may be caused by the different reaction conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As the reaction proceeded, the band width gradually decreased, indicating an increase of crystallinity. The As–O–Fe bidentate–binuclear coordinating to ferrihydrite is attributed to this band, demonstrating arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite [ 43 ]. A broad peak appeared at 1136 cm − 1 is assigned to structural SO 4 2- ions coordinating with CaSO4.2H 2 O or ferric sulfate compounds [ 50 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever the technology used to process arsenic-containing sulfide concentrates of non-ferrous metals, a series of solid, liquid, and/or gaseous streams containing arsenic in varying amounts will be generated. Thus, it is usually required to condense and stabilize it from gases [7][8][9][10][11][12], precipitate it from leaching solutions [13,14] or wastewaters [15][16][17], separate it from copper in smelter slag flotation [18], and/or minimize arsenic emissions to the atmosphere [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a surface-exposed crystal population of both copper and copper oxides, CuNFs are thus able to simultaneously catalyze both oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions. , This is of particular interest in the adsorptive reduction of heavy-metal oxyanions, where the dynamics of electron and hydrogen transfer are key to the metalloid capture pathway. , Arsenic water contamination, in particular, raises a worldwide concern for its high toxicity for concentrations above 10 μg·L –1 . , In this study, the removal of arsenic­(V) [As­(V)] from water by CuNFs by adsorption reduction was explored, with an initial ion concentration of 120 mg·L –1 simulating a severe groundwater contamination occurrence, a common adsorbent dose of 0.20 g·L –1 , and without the addition of electrolytes. , CuNFs were first found to exhibit ultrafast kinetics, reaching a capacity of 168 mg·g –1 after 60 s of contact, entailing the formation of a coprecipitate. A subsequent leg of chemisorption yielded up to 97% removal of As­(V).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%