1968
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.60.3.921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of B. subtilis DNA into complementary strands. 3. Direct analysis.

Abstract: Since the completion of the two preceding papers of this series1' 2 we have had the opportunity of examining, by direct base analysis, the composition of two -preparations of separated strands isolated, as described before,1 from the DNA of two strains of B. subtilis. The results will be found in Tables 1 and 2. TABLE 1. Composition of native DNA and of separated DNA strands of B. subtilis. Bases, (mole %) I -Strain W23

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
115
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then scientists have gathered very strong evidence for its general validity (8). Nevertheless, there are exceptions to the rule (7,9,12,14). However, as reported here, there seem to be none if the genome size exceeds 100 kb.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since then scientists have gathered very strong evidence for its general validity (8). Nevertheless, there are exceptions to the rule (7,9,12,14). However, as reported here, there seem to be none if the genome size exceeds 100 kb.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Discovered almost 40 years ago (7,8), before any sequence data were available, the rules continue to stimulate the search for their unknown underlying mechanism (6,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Obviously, base pairing does not provide one because the nucleotides of each single strand of a duplex are already paired with the nucleotides on their opposite strands and need not pair with any other on their own strand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4] in Table 2) came from strains that are known to be hosts for phages yielding DNA readily separable into complementary strands, as has been mentioned. Whether this is more than a coincidence cannot be said, nor whether it is significant that these strains are also spore-forming.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chargaff's second parity rule (Rudner et al, 1968;Forsdyke and Mortimer, 2000), is also true for the chromosomes. Even when applied to oligomers, the Chargaff's second parity rule still holds true, i.e., in the whole single-stranded sequence of chromosome, number of an oligomer is almost equal to that of its reverse complement.…”
Section: Science Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%