1996
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(96)00226-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of basic proteins in free solution capillary electrophoresis: effect of additive, temperature and voltage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, gemini of 2 mM is selected as the optimal. Cifuentes et al [30] reported the separation of basic proteins using CTAB as the dynamic coating, and higher concentration (10 mM) of CTAB present in buffer and lower temperature (107C) were required to obtain an acceptable separation. Ding and Fritz [31] separated the basic proteins using a buffer containing less CTAB (0.6 mM), but the efficiencies of proteins were not reported.…”
Section: Protein Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, gemini of 2 mM is selected as the optimal. Cifuentes et al [30] reported the separation of basic proteins using CTAB as the dynamic coating, and higher concentration (10 mM) of CTAB present in buffer and lower temperature (107C) were required to obtain an acceptable separation. Ding and Fritz [31] separated the basic proteins using a buffer containing less CTAB (0.6 mM), but the efficiencies of proteins were not reported.…”
Section: Protein Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covalently linked or physically adsorbed polymer coating [7][8][9][10] provided good separation efficiency; however, it often suffered from short lifetime, troublesome preparation procedure, or unsatisfactory reproducibility. Dynamic coating [11,12] is a relatively attractive method due to its simplicity and versatility; however, the dynamic coating additive in buffer may interact with the analyte and ruin the separation or detection, e.g., it may interfere with ESI-MS detection. Lucy and co-workers [13][14][15] proposed a novel type of semipermanent capillary coatings based on the selfassembly of double-chained surfactants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may be caused by the hydroxyl groups which possess higher hydrophilicity, and thus the HEC coating can be washed off the capillary wall easily due to its hydrophilicity. Therefore, in order to solve the insufficient adsorption of hydrophilic polymer on the capillary wall, a variety of positively charged polymers, such as polyethyleneimine [21,22]; a copolymer of vinylpyrrolidone and vinylimidazole [23]; Polybrene, poly(methoxyethoxyethyl) ethylenimine, poly(diallyldimethylammonium) chloride [24,25], ethylpyrrolidine methacrylate-N,N-dimethylacrylamide (EpyM-DMA) [26,27] were used as capillary coating for protein analysis by CE. Especially, cationic polysaccharides and their derivatives have attracted much attention for their both dynamic coating ability and reproducibility of separations [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%