Fractional abundances of 14 C and 13 C in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in sediment porewaters may hold important clues about organic carbon cycling in sediments. Yet there is a dearth of isotopic signatures for porewater DOC because of the difficulty associated with oxidizing DOC in seawater. At present, marine DOC can be processed for analyses of 14 C and 13 C with high precision and minimal contamination by ultraviolet (UV) oxidation, but this method is resource intensive and could be difficult to implement. To resolve this, a thermal sulfate reduction (TSR) method, previously developed to determine 13 C in seawater DOC (Fry et al. 1996), was modified and tested for 14 C and 13 C determination in porewater DOC. CO 2 yields from six test materials ranged between 90% and 108%. d Application of TSR to archived porewater DOC samples from a sediment incubation experiment revealed notable changes in isotopic values that were not readily discerned in the DOC concentration data alone. The total uncertainty in the 14 C values after blank correction was ± 0.005 to 0.02 fraction modern (Fm) for sample sizes ranging between 143 and 560 µg C. For systems where precision on the order of ± 0.02 Fm is acceptable, TSR could be a viable alternative to UV oxidation for processing small, concentrated marine DOC samples.
*Corresponding author: E-mail: tkomada@sfsu.edu
AcknowledgmentsWe thank Ann McNichol for encouraging us to pursue this method and for sharing the protocol that she and Bill Martin developed. Sheila Griffin and Ellen Druffel generated the UV oxidation data, ran our AMS samples, and provided many helpful discussions. Xiaomei Xu provided assistance in radiocarbon data interpretation. Sabrina Crispo ran the TOC-V and assisted in the laboratory and in the field. We thank the captain and crew of R/V Point Sur, J. Polly, R. Paul, D. Burdige, M. Jinuntuya, and A. Pitts for the work conducted in the Santa Monica Basin. Three anonymous reviewers provided comments that helped improve the quality of this manuscript. This work was supported by NSF-OCE0726819 (TK) and James C Kelley Scholarship (LJ).Acknowledgment is made to the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund for partial support of this research (ACS-PRF #46120-GB2 to TK). DOI 10.4319/lom.2011.9.485 Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods 9, 2011, 485-498 © 2011, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.
LIMNOLOGY and OCEANOGRAPHY: METHODSues for marine porewater DOC have been reported in only a handful of studies (Bauer et al. 1995; Alperin et al. 2000).Several different methods have been developed to oxidize DOC to CO 2 for subsequent determination of 14 C and 13 C. As summarized by Bauer (2002), these can be broadly categorized into three types: (1) UV oxidation (Armstrong et al. 1966;Williams 1968; Williams et al. 1969; Williams and Gordon 1970;Druffel et al. 1989; Bauer et al. 1998;Beaupré et al. 2007), (2) sealed-tube dry combustion (Fry et al. 1993; Fry et al. 1996), and (3) flow-through high-temperature oxidation (Bauer ...