Processing Declarative Knowledge
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0013554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEPIA 3.0 — An extensible prolog system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The opposite is Cygwin [13], that emulates the POSIX API on Windows platforms. To the best of our knowledge, SEPIA was the first system to use this approach, in this case to emulate other Prolog systems [14].…”
Section: Portability Approaches and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite is Cygwin [13], that emulates the POSIX API on Windows platforms. To the best of our knowledge, SEPIA was the first system to use this approach, in this case to emulate other Prolog systems [14].…”
Section: Portability Approaches and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SEPIA [7] design we have tried to learn from the problems and to do everything better (the" second system syndrome"). Since we felt that the main problems of the previous implementation were slow compilation, non-incrementality and bad performance, the main changes were made there.…”
Section: Sepiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These predecessor systems were • ECRC-Prolog, a system that focused on efficient implementation of data-driven execution mechanisms; • Sepia, a followup system with an emphasis on flexibility, extensibility, and scalability (Meier et al 1989); • CHIP, the first CLP system with a finite-domain solver (Dincbas et al 1988); • Megalog, which emphasised persistence and database functionality (Bocca 1991); and • Elipsys, an Or-parallel implementation of Prolog (Dorochevsky et al 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• ECRC-Prolog, a system that focused on efficient implementation of data-driven execution mechanisms; • Sepia, a followup system with an emphasis on flexibility, extensibility, and scalability (Meier et al 1989); • CHIP, the first CLP system with a finite-domain solver (Dincbas et al 1988);…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%