2017
DOI: 10.1111/trf.14049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Septic transfusion case caused by a platelet pool with visible clotting due to contamination with Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Visual inspection of blood components before transfusion is an essential safety practice to interdict the transfusion of bacterially contaminated units.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common feature of our near‐miss incidents and by others reporting platelets contaminated with S. aureus is the appearance of visual aggregates in the unit . This serves to underline the importance of visual inspection of all blood components prior to issue, and at the time of transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common feature of our near‐miss incidents and by others reporting platelets contaminated with S. aureus is the appearance of visual aggregates in the unit . This serves to underline the importance of visual inspection of all blood components prior to issue, and at the time of transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These measures decrease the risk of false‐negative screens and contamination rates of both pooled (4 donors) and apheresis (single donor) units and have remained relatively stable over time . False‐negative screening cultures for S. aureus resulting in septic reactions have been reported by others , and suggested explanations include bacterial numbers below detection levels in the sample, sequestration of the bacteria in plasma clots and biofilm formation . We document here four incidents of S. aureus contaminations of platelet units not detected on routine screening, the investigation of contributing donors for skin carriage of S. aureus and the follow‐up and management of these donors together with follow‐up of donors whose donations were confirmed positive for S. aureus contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, visual inspection could theoretically have prevented two‐thirds of TTBIs that might have occurred in the absence of visual inspection. Notably, S. aureus accounted for 63% of bacterially contaminated retrieved PCs, indicating not only the easy aggregability of S. aureus ‐contaminated PC, but also the crucial role of visual inspection, particularly in detecting PC contaminated with S. aureus , one of the most common causes of TTBI . Visual inspection has proceeded at the cost of discarding around 1000 PCs over the past 8 years, although only 2.8% of them were in fact bacterially contaminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, transfusion of microbially contaminated PC was prevented due to visual anomalies, e.g., clot formation, lack of swirling, or color change [47, 50]. …”
Section: Septic Reactions Due To False-negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is certainly the most controversial approach due to the implicit acceptance of an increased risk of transfusion-associated morbidity and mortality. The decrease in the number of platelet transfusion-transmitted infections, particularly in the last 2 decades, should not divert from the fact that a substantial risk for patients still exists [10, 50]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%