c Plasmodium falciparum malaria is highly endemic in the three most affected countries in the current epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa. As EVD and malaria are clinically indistinguishable, both remain part of the differential diagnosis of ill travelers from returning from areas of EVD transmission. We compared the performances of a rapid diagnostic test (Binax-NOW) and real-time PCR with P. falciparum-positive specimens before and after heat and Triton X-100 inactivation, and we documented no loss of sensitivity.T he current outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa is the largest on record (1), and guidance has emerged in hospital and outpatient settings around screening for EVD in ill travelers who have returned from areas of EVD transmission (2, 3). Plasmodium falciparum malaria is highly endemic in the three most affected countries, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea, which contribute Ͼ3 million cases annually to the global burden of malaria (4). Malaria can cause severe morbidity and mortality if diagnosis and/or treatment are delayed (5); yet, hospital laboratories are often ill-prepared to handle specimens from an individual suspected to have a filoviral infection (6). Laboratory safety must be balanced against the timely exclusion of malaria in ill travelers who have returned from EVD-affected regions in order to avoid adverse outcomes in patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended the addition of Triton X-100 and heat inactivation at 56°C prior to testing specimens from patients suspected to have filoviral infection, in addition to performing enhanced safety procedures, such as using personal protective equipment (PPE) and a certified class II biosafety cabinet (BSC) (7,8). The inactivation of blood prior to the preparation of malaria thin smears is unnecessary, as filoviruses are inherently susceptible to methanol (7, 9), the solvent in which malaria thin smears are fixed prior to staining. However, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for malaria are widely and routinely used in hematology and microbiology laboratories and have no corresponding fixation step. Similarly, the extraction of nucleic acid for molecular diagnostic assays is presumed to inactivate filoviruses, although data on this are lacking.The available data on the effects of filoviral inactivation procedures on the performance characteristics of malaria diagnostic assays are limited and variable (10, 11). We sought to evaluate the performance characteristics of both RDT and quantitative realtime PCR for detecting P. falciparum malaria following Triton X-100 and heat inactivation compared to those using the standard operating procedure. We documented no loss of sensitivity for either assay when performing filoviral inactivation procedures.Thirty-one P. falciparum-containing whole blood EDTA specimens, with parasitemia levels ranging from Ͻ0.1% to 6.6% and confirmed by microscopy and RDT (BinaxNOW Malaria, Alere, ME), were included, along with 10 negative-control EDTA specimens. Nin...